My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda Packet November 17, 2025
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2025
>
11-17-2025
>
City Council Agenda Packet November 17, 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2025 12:53:13 PM
Creation date
12/5/2025 12:47:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/17/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Purpose and Intent of Water -Oriented Structures <br />Staff calculated our proposal as 780 SF, "nearly double" the 400 SF allowance. <br />We respectfully clarify: the shed addition totals 460 SF, only +60 SF over <br />allowed. The deck is a replacement, not a water -oriented structure, and should <br />not be included in the calculation. <br />Our impervious coverage remains well below thresholds, and Lake Orono is <br />dam -controlled and regulated, minimizing runoff risk. <br />A berm lies between the structure and shoreline, providing natural screening. <br />In addition, our bay is shallow, secluded, and unused for recreation, meaning the <br />structure has virtually no public visibility. <br />Enclosing equipment reduces shoreline clutter, further supporting the ordinance's <br />intent to minimize impact. <br />2. Comprehensive Plan <br />The Plan emphasizes protecting resources and preserving residential use. Our <br />project consolidates storage, improving shoreline appearance and limiting clutter. <br />The structure is 125 feet from the shoreline, farther than many other existing or <br />permitted structures. <br />The project supports recreational residential use and aligns with the character <br />envisioned in the Plan. <br />3. Reasonable Use <br />A 100 SF shed is not reasonable for a family of five with multiple kayaks and <br />lake -use equipment. <br />Staff suggested other compliant areas exist, but wetlands and a city -held <br />stormwater easement/retention pond eliminate those options. <br />DNR representative James Bedell and City staff member Joseph Hale <br />confirmed during their site visit that this is the only feasible location. <br />4. Hardship and Unique Circumstances <br />Staff identified the hardship as "self-created." We respectfully disagree. <br />Our hardship stems from protected wetlands and a city -held stormwater <br />easement, which restricts usable land. We pay taxes on this land but cannot use <br />it. <br />This constraint is unique to our lot and not a result of our actions. <br />Page 233 of 379
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.