My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustments Packet - November 25, 2025 with Presentations
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
11-25-2025
>
Board of Adjustments Packet - November 25, 2025 with Presentations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2025 8:21:36 AM
Creation date
11/26/2025 8:19:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
date
11/25/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To the City of Elk River Board of Adjustment, <br />I’m writing in support of Benjamin and Andrea Poythress and their request <br />regarding the improvements to their water-oriented structure. I live across the lake, <br />and I’d like to offer a simple perspective from someone who actually sees (or in <br />this case, won’t see) the project in question. <br />Their property sits in a section of the lake that isn’t exactly a high-traffic, postcard <br />backdrop. It’s tucked into a quiet, shallow bay that most people avoid unless they <br />enjoy lily pads and aquatic vegetation rearranging their boat props. In other words, <br />anything they build back there is going to be visible to about three people—and <br />I’m one of them. And even I won’t be able to see it. <br />I have no concerns whatsoever about the shed addition or the deck expansion. It <br />won’t be an eyesore, it won’t affect lake aesthetics, and it won’t impact shoreline <br />use or enjoyment for anyone else. They’re improving their property, replacing <br />older structures, and adding value—not only to their home, but indirectly to the <br />surrounding properties as well. They’re good people, responsible neighbors, and <br />diligent stewards of their land. They pay their taxes, follow the rules, and aren’t <br />exactly running a shipyard or building a hotel down there. <br />I understand and appreciate the Board’s responsibility to protect the lake and <br />uphold the ordinance. That work matters, and the consistency you bring to these <br />decisions preserves the standards we all enjoy. At the same time, it seems <br />reasonable to evaluate this project within the spirit and intent of the code, not only <br />the strictest possible interpretation of square footage definitions—especially when <br />the deck in question is simply covering an existing cement pad and has no <br />environmental impact. <br />The Poythress request is modest, practical, and—frankly—less intrusive than many <br />lakeside structures that already exist all around the shoreline. I trust their judgment <br />completely, and I fully support the project as they’ve proposed it. <br />Thank you for your time, for the work you do, and for your thoughtful <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br />Benjamin Larson <br />18672 Lander Dr NW, Elk River, MN 55330 <br />Page 30 of 97
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.