My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Packet 09-15-2025
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2025
>
09-15-2025
>
City Council Packet 09-15-2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2025 11:18:58 AM
Creation date
9/17/2025 11:05:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/15/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
556
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Action <br />City of <br />Elk <br />River <br />To <br />City Council <br />Meeting Date <br />September 15, 2025 <br />Item Description <br />Variance: Garage/Accessory Dwelling Unit Size, <br />Jennifer Belde - 21 131 Vernon St NW <br />Item Number <br />7.2 <br />Prepared By <br />Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner <br />Reviewed by <br />Zack Carlton <br />Cal Portner <br />Tina Allard <br />Action Requested <br />Direct staff to draft a resolution making findings of fact denying the accessory structure size variances, as the <br />standards for approval, as noted below, are not met. The City Council will consider the resolution on <br />October 20, 2025. <br />1. The variance is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, as the proposed <br />ADU exceeds the maximum allowable living area by 600 square feet and the accessory structure <br />exceeds the permitted size by 148 square feet, undermining the ordinance standards intended to <br />ensure ADUs remain subordinate to the principal dwelling and that accessory structures remain <br />consistent with neighborhood character. <br />2. The variance is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which anticipates orderly residential <br />development supported by zoning standards. Granting the variance would conflict with the <br />implementing ordinances that guide residential scale and character. <br />3. The property can be reasonably used without the variance, as the zoning ordinance already permits a <br />1,000 square foot ADU and accessory structures up to 2,500 square feet. A compliant ADU and <br />garage could be constructed without exceeding size limits. <br />4. The plight of the applicant is not due to circumstances unique to the property, but rather a result of <br />the existing home and garage design, which does not justify exceeding ordinance limits. Economic <br />considerations or design preferences do not constitute practical difficulties. <br />5. Granting the variance could alter the essential character of the locality, as the size of the proposed <br />ADU may compete in scale with principal dwellings, changing the intended residential character of the <br />R- I a district. <br />Background/Discussion <br />The 1.6-acre property, zoned R I -a (Single -Family Residential), is permitted a maximum of 2,500 sq ft. of <br />accessory structure space, including accessory dwelling units (ADU), and a maximum of 1,000 sf of ADUs. <br />The applicant is proposing a total of 2,648 sq ft. of accessory structures exceeding the maximum allowed by <br />148 sf, as well as proposing 1,600 sf of ADU exceeding the maximum allowed by 600 sf. <br />The Elk River Vision <br />A avelcoming community with revolutionary and spirited resourcefulness, exceptional service, and community p p W E R E 0 A T <br />engagement that encourages and inspires PEI <br />556 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.