Laserfiche WebLink
The Elk River Vision <br />A welcoming community with revolutionary and spirited resourcefulness, exceptional service, and community <br />engagement that encourages and inspires prosperity <br /> <br />Request for Action <br /> <br />To <br />Board of Adjustments <br />Item Number <br />5.1 <br /> <br />Meeting Date <br />August 26, 2025 <br />Prepared By <br />Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner <br /> <br />Item Description <br />Variance: Garage/Accessory Dwelling Unit Size, <br />Jennifer Belde - 21131 Vernon St NW <br />Reviewed by <br />Zack Carlton <br /> <br />Action Requested <br />Deny, by motion, the accessory structure size variances for the following reasons: <br />1. The variance is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, as the proposed <br />ADU exceeds the maximum allowable living area by 600 square feet and the accessory structure <br />exceeds the permitted size by 148 square feet, undermining the ordinance standards intended to <br />ensure ADUs remain subordinate to the principal dwelling and that accessory structures remain <br />consistent with neighborhood character. <br />2. The variance is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which anticipates orderly residential <br />development supported by zoning standards. Granting the variance would conflict with the <br />implementing ordinances that guide residential scale and character. <br />3. The property can be reasonably used without the variance, as the zoning ordinance already permits a <br />1,000 square foot ADU and accessory structures up to 2,500 square feet. A compliant ADU and <br />garage could be constructed without exceeding size limits. <br />4. The plight of the applicant is not due to circumstances unique to the property, but rather a result of <br />the existing home and garage design, which does not justify exceeding ordinance limits. Economic <br />considerations or design preferences do not constitute practical difficulties. <br />5. Granting the variance could alter the essential character of the locality, as the size of the proposed <br />ADU may compete in scale with principal dwellings, changing the intended residential character of the <br />R-1a district. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Background/Discussion <br />The 1.6-acre property, zoned R1-a (Single-Family Residential), is permitted a maximum of 2,500 sq.ft. of <br />accessory structure space, including accessory dwelling units (ADU), and a maximum of 1,000 sq.ft. of ADUs. <br /> <br />They are proposing a total of 2,648 sq.ft. of accessory structures exceeding the maximum allowed by 148 <br />sq.ft. as well as proposing 1,600 sq.ft. of ADU exceeding the maximum allowed by 600 sq.ft.. <br /> <br />They are requesting the variances to build a dual-purpose building on their property as they are planning for a <br />father-in-law who retired last year and a disabled sister-in-law to move in with them and provide comfortable <br />Page 5 of 52