Laserfiche WebLink
The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a consequence of the <br />petition's own action or inaction; and <br />As we considered this criteria, the challenge we have is the unique size and shape of our attached <br />garage. We purchased our home in 2011 and our 2.5 stall attached garage was part of the original <br />owner’s build. This restricts our ability to build a more standard sized building and potentially <br />increasing the cost to build. <br />The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality <br />We have lived in our home for 13 years and 7 months. If approved our property and it’s structures <br />would remain consistent with those of our neighbors. However, the external physical appearance of <br />our property would be improved by allowing us to store all of our vehicles, boats, bobcat, hockey <br />rink and nets indoors. <br /> <br />Page 12 of 52