My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2025 PRMIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Minutes
>
2020 - Current
>
2025
>
07-09-2025 PRMIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2025 10:13:42 AM
Creation date
8/22/2025 10:13:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRM
date
7/9/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes Page 6 <br />June 11, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br />clarified that this year there is a $50,000 budget, and next year $50,000 is budgeted. The money part is <br />more staff time than contracted services. Mr. Stremcha suggested they break down the plan into bite- <br />size, pieces. For example, at the next two meetings, they could discuss the introduction, then the next <br />two meetings discuss trends, then the needs assessment and community engagement, then the <br />framework such as structuring data that was gathered, then crafting the final plan a year from now. <br />Breaking down six chapters into bite size pieces over 12 months. They would be crafting the plan as <br />they go and delegating it to staff. They could use a company such as HKGI to do some fine tuning to <br />craft a 110-page document based on the information provided by the commission and staff. They can <br />see how much can be done in house and then leverage the funding/budget for the plan to be lower. <br />Mr. Stremcha also pointed out that just because money is in the budget doesn’t mean they have to <br />spend it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Niziolek said he wants to know how much money they have to spend. He reiterated <br />that they have $250,000 to spend per year so he feels that the plan should be based off of that amount <br />to spend. Chair Anderson said that right now they still need a plan because the current one is <br />obsolete. <br /> <br />Mr. Stremcha pointed out that funding sources could change in the future, so they need to identify <br />priorities and then as funds become available, they take those items off the list. Chair Anderson said if <br />they take the time to do this it will give them great appreciation for what they have done. <br /> <br /> <br />10. 2 Playground Plan <br /> <br />Mr Shelby Presented his report. He reviewed the playground replacement spreadsheet provided in the <br />packet pointing out the estimated cost of replacement for each playground and then the amount of <br />funding coming from the liquor store fund. <br /> <br />Mr. Shelby shared that the Country Crossing Park playground has already started shrinking due to the <br />need to remove pieces for safety. Staff won’t remove the whole thing though since what remains is <br />safe. Staff can evaluate piece by piece. This is the first playground on the replacement schedule. <br />According to the schedule there will be a playground needing to be replaced on almost an annual <br />basis. <br /> <br />Chair Anderson asked if staff are comfortable with the anticipated playground life span of 25 years <br />and if there is the possibility of getting the playgrounds past that number. Mr. Shelby said that while it <br />is a possibly, it isn’t guaranteed. <br /> <br />Chair Anderson said this made him think of sustainability. He said with only $250,000 coming into <br />the park fund, there isn’t the ability to replace all these items with the budget laid out in front of them. <br />He said that when they were installing all these amenities back in the day, they didn’t realize that they <br />would need to replace all of them. Chair Anderson said they need to think about what playgrounds <br />they should be replacing. He said they should also be looking at all their needs and come up with <br />additional funding sources. He thinks that they need to come up with a fallback list of what <br />playgrounds should be targeted for replacement when they need it based on condition and safety, but <br />he is not sure how to do that. He isn’t sure if the community needs 5 playgrounds, 10 <br />playgrounds…at one time they thought the community needed 16 and they can’t afford that. <br />Page 7 of 31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.