Laserfiche WebLink
Table 8. Permit Approvals, Applications, and Certifications <br />Unit of Government <br />Type of Application <br />Status <br />Federal <br />Wetland Delineation Concurrence and Jurisdictional <br />To be applied for <br />U.S. Army Corps of <br />Determination <br />Section 404 Individual Permit <br />To be applied for, if <br />Engineers <br />needed <br />State <br />National Pollution Discharge Elimination System <br />(NPDES) Permit To be applied for <br />Sewer Extension Permit <br />Minnesota Pollution <br />Y <br />Control Agency (MPCA) I Water Appropriation Permit To be applied for, if <br />401 Certification needed <br />I Notice of Intent to Demolish Structures To be applied for, if <br />needed <br />Minnesota Department of Water main Extension Permit To be applied for <br />Health (MDH) Well Sealing Permit To be applied for <br />Water Appropriation Permit <br />Minnesota Department of <br />To be applied for, if <br />Natural Resources (MnDNR) .General Permit for Temporary Appropriations <br />needed <br />Public Water Work Permit <br />Local <br />EAW/EIS Need Decision <br />Pending <br />Wetland Conservation Act - Boundary Approval <br />Approved <br />Wetland Conservation Act - Replacement Plan <br />To be applied for <br />City of Elk River <br />Preliminary and Final Plat <br />Pending <br />Excavation, Grading, and Filling Permit <br />To be applied for <br />Building Permit <br />To be applied for <br />Building Sewers and Connections Permit <br />To be applied for <br />Criteria D: Extent to Which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled <br />Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7 (D) indicates the final factor the RGU must consider is the "extent to <br />which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies <br />undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs." The City of Elk River's <br />findings are set forth below. <br />1. The proposed project design, plans, EAW, related studies, and mitigation measures apply <br />knowledge, approaches, standards, and best management practices gained from previous <br />experience and projects that have, in general, successfully mitigated potential offsite <br />environmental effects. <br />2. The EAW, in conjunction with this document, contains or references the known studies that <br />provide information or guidance regarding environmental effects that can be anticipated and <br />controlled. <br />3. Other projects studied under environmental reviews in Minnesota have included studies and <br />mitigation measures comparable to those included in this EAW. <br />Oakwater Ridge EAW 12 <br />Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Response to Comments, and Record of Decision <br />