Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes <br />June 11, 2025 <br />--------- <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />Commissioner Niziolek asked what the distance is between the trees that are being preserved. Mr. <br />Barker said he is not sure. Commissioner Niziolek is wondering if they could put a traditional <br />playground in the park property with the trees located where they are. Chair Anderson said it would <br />not likely be without some tree removal, and some of the trees there have seen their better days. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stewart asked for the determination of the size and location of the HOA property. Mr. <br />Barker said the size was reduced to below three acres and is shown as outlot E on the preliminary plat, <br />down in the flood plain body that is not considered wetland. Commissioner Niziolek asked if the HOA <br />access removes handicapped accessibility to the river for the community residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Barker said there are multiple places where the city could put a boardwalk and/or other access to <br />the river for the public. Any property that isn’t part of the HOA river access could be a crossing. There <br />are still two-thirds of the river that is still available to the public. Mr. Barker explained that the trail that <br />is designed to go through the park could be designed to go down to the river beyond the HOA. <br /> <br />Commissioner Niziolek said the HOA bothers him. He said that part came up right at the end of their <br />discussions on the property. He feels that they are trying to create a community that works together, <br />shares resources, and takes care of each other. He does not feel that having the HOA in the middle of <br />it is something he could approve of. He wants thoughtful consideration of the removal of the HOA <br />piece. Mr. Barker explains that this HOA property location is not the first option they showed, and <br />Capstone gave up their initial HOA plan for the creation of the park on the bluff top, and now this is <br />the result. He thinks that having the bluff top park is the best piece of land along the river, and the <br />developer gave that up. They want to work together and have a great community that interconnects as <br />well. <br /> <br />Chair Anderson said he is still disappointed with the size of the park on the bluff and that his position <br />has not changed since the beginning. <br /> <br />Moved by Commissioner Loidolt and seconded by Chair Anderson to approve park <br />dedication for Oak Water Ridge, consistent with the following conditions, and consistent <br />with the City Council action on April 7, 2025: <br /> <br />1. The developer shall complete the design and installation of all 10-foot-wide trails <br />above the bluff. <br />2. The developer will design and engineer a 10-foot-wide trail, beginning with the <br />termination of the upland trail. They shall be provided to the city to support a <br />future construction project. <br />3. The developer will provide a 2+ acre bluff top park and must provide <br />documentation that there is at least 1-acre of buildable, upland area, within the <br />park. <br />4. The developer shall dedicate the floodway land below the bluff, to the city for park <br />purposes. An out lot will be reserved for future use by the HOA. <br />5. The remainder of the park dedication requirements will be satisfied with a cash <br />dedication of $536,000. This will be pro-rated on a per lot basis and payable with the <br />final plat. <br />6. Civil plans must identify parallel, off-street, parking areas near the bluff top park.