Laserfiche WebLink
The cheapest and least skillful type of plank construction eliminated the need for fancy <br />rabbets and grooves. Builders lapped the plank on the outside surface of the sill timber and <br />the roof plate and nailed it in place. This was easy and quick, but the nails themselves ended <br />up bearing the weight of the structure, since the planks did not actually sit on top of the sill <br />timber. (See John Rempel, Building with Wood, and Other Aspects ofNineteenth-Century <br />Building in Central Canada, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, first edition, 1967, <br />revised edition 1980), 175-177 and 177 for illustration of a house similar to the Fox House; <br />Stephen B. Jordan, "Houses Without Frames," Old House Journal, May -June 1993, 36-37.) <br />The Fox House <br />The Fox House uses the simplest and least expensive approach to plank house construction. <br />It is a one and one-half story structure built with two-inch thick vertical oak planks attached <br />with cut nails to the outside of the sill and roof plate. The planks run from the roofline down <br />to the stone foundation and cover the sill. There are no rabbets or grooves in the sill or roof <br />plate, and no shaping was done to the ends of the oak planks. The one and one-half inch thick <br />oak planks vary in width from as narrow as about eight and one-half inches up to twelve and <br />one-half inches. (This information is assembled from a variety of Fox House reports and <br />close analysis of photographs. Plank width and thickness from Bill Morgan and Marilyn <br />Salzl Brinkman, Light from the Hearth: Central Minnesota Pioneers and Early Architecture <br />(St. Cloud: North Star Press, 1982), 60. See endnote 41, Dr. Morgan measured planks <br />himself in April 1981.) <br />(Note that quite a bit of the existing written materials on the Fox House is conflicting and <br />incorrect. The text for the outdoor panel, which states "the 2-inch thick and 14-inch wide <br />planks fit into an indentation in the sill..." is incorrect. Also note that the "Fox House <br />Interpretive Manual" by Lois Gaetz, is confusing on this detail: The manual states, "These <br />planks formed the support, there are no corner posts, the boards are butted with the ends <br />reduced to tenons to fit into slots cut in the sills. Originally the boards were joined with <br />wooden pegs called treenails (trunnels). Planks in the Fox house are joined with cut nails. <br />The second floor planks are attached to another horizontal board, called a plate, in the same <br />way as the first floor planks. The attic plate, requiring less load bearing strength was pegged <br />to second floor planks."p. 3—There is no attic above the second floor. The National Register <br />Nomination also misstates the width of the planks.) <br />Plaster <br />Vernon Bailey said that when his family came to Bailey Station between Elk River and Big <br />Lake in 1870, "Father and Charles found plenty of work at plastering and brick and stone <br />laying at what seemed enormous wages, three dollars a day, when ordinary labor brought <br />about one dollar a day." (Vernon Bailey, "The Hiram Bailey Family, Pioneers of America <br />and Early Settlers of the Middle West," typescript, SCHS, 16) <br />When the builders completed installing the walls and roofing the Fox House, they were ready <br />to start finishing the interior. They nailed one -inch furring strips to the vertical planks, then <br />nailed lath to the furring strips. Now they were ready to plaster the walls. The Fox House <br />interior was finished with historic three -coat wet plaster. <br />Sherburne County Historical Society Heritage Center Interpretive Plan, April 21, 2005, page 98 <br />