My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sherburne County Heritage Center Interpretive Plan Final Report 2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Heritage Preservation Commission
>
HPC Documents
>
Inventory
>
Sherburne County Heritage Center Interpretive Plan Final Report 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2025 1:09:49 PM
Creation date
7/23/2025 12:49:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Warren, History of the Ojibway People, (St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society, 1984) 236- <br />241; quote on 240) <br />Sherburne County remained contested area between the Dakota and Ojibwe even after an <br />1825 treaty creating a boundary between the tribes. The Ft. Snelling Military Reservation, <br />negotiated by Zebulon Pike in 1805, allowed the United States government to establish a fort <br />on land that would later become Minneapolis and St. Paul, but it did not allow settlement. In <br />the interests of reducing conflict between several tribes in the Upper Midwest, the United <br />States government negotiated a boundary treaty between tribes in 1825 at Fort Crawford in <br />Prairie du Chien. The partition created a boundary between the warring Dakota and Ojibwe <br />tribes that cut the land that would become Sherburne County almost in half. The northern <br />portion was reserved for the njibwe, and the southern for the Dakota. Treaties in 1837 <br />concluded between the Dakota and Ojibwe were the first treaties to open Minnesota land to <br />settlement by Furopean immigrants. This treaty opened all of present Sherburne County to <br />settlement. But it did not stop serious battles and skirmishes between the tribes, which <br />continued in the border area even after the treaty. (See, for instance, 1839 massacre of 70 <br />Ojibwe women and children by Dakota on the Rum River in retaliation for the killing of a <br />hunter near Lake Harriet) <br />(More research should be conducted by acquiring Anton Steven Treuer, "Ojibwe-Dakota <br />Relations: Diplomacy, War, and Social Union, 1679-1862," MA Thesis, University of <br />Minnesota, 1994.) <br />Theme Statement <br />Theme 1: People searching for opportunities have always recognized the unique resources of <br />Sherburne County. <br />Subtheme 1.2. Indian tribes recognized that the area that later became Sherburne County <br />was strategically located on the edge of woodlands, prairie, and the Mississippi River, and as <br />a result, the area was a contested borderland between the Ojibwe and Dakota people for <br />about 150 years. <br />Contemporary visitor relevance: All audience segments expressed high interest in the <br />American Indian history of Sherburne County. Sixty-nine percent of members who <br />responded preferred exhibits that re-created scenes from the past with immersion exhibits or <br />exhibit vignettes. This content and methodology was a consistent interest in other audience <br />segments. The audience survey also suggested potential visitors preferred to hear stories told <br />in the words of the participants, whenever possible. These stories will help residents of <br />Sherburne County understand some of the historical background for the existence of the <br />Ojibwe Mille Lacs Indian Reservation, not far from Sherburne County. <br />Desired Learner Outcomes: (feeling, knowledge, skills) <br />1. Some visitors will recall that Sherburne County is located on ahistorical boundary line <br />between Dakota and Ojibwe. (cognitive) <br />2. Some visitors will recall that history is collected and passed on in different ways in <br />different cultures. (cognitive) <br />Sherburne County Historical Society Heritage Center Interpretive Plan, April 21, 2005, page 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.