My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Prehistoric and Euroamerican Archaeology of Elk River, Minnesota: Current Knowlege and Probability Modeling
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Heritage Preservation Commission
>
HPC Documents
>
Inventory
>
Prehistoric and Euroamerican Archaeology of Elk River, Minnesota: Current Knowlege and Probability Modeling
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2025 1:08:09 PM
Creation date
7/23/2025 12:44:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Archaeological Probability Model <br />Background and Theory <br />The archaeological probability model is based on the types of environmental settings that <br />past inhabitants of Elk River would have found most suitable for habitation and use. <br />Models are simplified constructions of more complex phenomena, and begin with the most <br />important factors that lead to a final outcome or result. For Elk River, certain <br />environmental parameters provide strong factors in determining where peoples in the past <br />lived. Humans in the pre -industrial eras were far more constrained by environmental <br />conditions than we are today. In the past, people could not prosper at all locations on the <br />landscape; in the present (with the benefit of heavy machinery and engineering skills) we are <br />much more accustomed to modifying the landscape to fit our needs and desires. Many <br />obvious constraints come to mind: humans cannot survive without access to perennial fresh <br />water; farmers cannot prosper without arable land, villages can not be placed on precipitous <br />slopes. We can develop reasonable probability models to depict a range of suitable <br />environments in which humans could have prospered. <br />Human behavior and human choice, on the other hand, are difficult to model, because <br />they often cannot be predicted given the logic of an observer removed hundreds or even <br />thousands of years, and because human behavior is not consistent. When human choice is <br />introduced, many different outcomes are possible. For example, many people settle in <br />locations for reasons of tradition or family ties, even when more environmentally amenable <br />spots may exist ("it was good enough for grandpa and it's good enough for me"). This <br />behavior, which we all know is common among humans, cannot be readily modeled. <br />Combine this with the dearth of information on prehistoric settlements in the Elk River, and <br />there is limited predictive value in the model. Rather, the purpose of the model is to assess <br />the probability that specific kinds of locations and environments were favored by prior <br />inhabitants of Elk River. In other words, the model can identify which areas would have <br />been most amenable and thus most likely to have been utilized and inhabited in the past, but <br />the model cannot determine whether such areas were actually utilized. Thus while the model <br />is a useful planning tool, field studies are still essential. <br />Elk River Environmental Settin <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.