My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.4 SR 06-16-2025
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2025
>
06-16-2025
>
6.4 SR 06-16-2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2025 4:46:38 PM
Creation date
6/30/2025 4:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/16/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />4 <br />City of Elk River <br />Required Communication <br /> <br /> <br />Our Responsibility in Relation to Government Auditing Standards <br />As communicated in our engagement letter, part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether <br />the basic financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the City's <br />compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, <br />noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of basic <br />financial statement amounts. However, the objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on <br />compliance with such provisions. <br /> <br />Our Responsibility in Relation to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform <br /> Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards <br /> (Uniform Guidance) <br />As communicated in our engagement letter, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, we examined <br />on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with the types of compliance requirements <br />described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement applicable to <br />each of its major federal programs for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the City's compliance <br />with those requirements. While our audit provided a reasonable basis for our opinion, it did not <br />provide a legal determination on the City's compliance with those requirements. <br /> <br />In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over <br />compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each <br />major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the <br />circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal <br />program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform <br />Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control <br />over compliance. <br /> <br />Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit <br />We conducted our audit consistent with the planned scope and timing we previously communicated <br />to you. <br /> <br />Compliance with All Ethics Requirements Regarding Independence <br />The engagement team, others in our firm, as appropriate, our firm, and our network firms have <br />complied with all relevant ethical requirements regarding independence. <br /> <br />Significant Risks Identified <br />We have identified the following significant risks of material misstatement: <br /> <br />• Management Override of Controls – Management override of internal control is considered a <br />risk in substantially all engagements as management may be incentivized to produce better <br />results. <br />• Misappropriation of Assets – If duties cannot be appropriately segregated, there is a risk of <br />unauthorized disbursements being made by the City. In addition, generally this results in less <br />review taking place as transactions are recorded in the financial statements. <br />• Improper Revenue Recognition – Revenue recognition is considered a fraud risk on <br />substantially all engagements as it generally has a significant impact on the results of the <br />government's operations. In addition, complexities exist surrounding the calculation and <br />recording of various revenue sources. <br />• Pension Valuation – Net Pension Liability, Deferred Outflows of Resources Related to Pensions, <br />and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions – These pensions are generally material <br />to the financial <br />statements and involve significant estimates. <br />Page 379 of 637
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.