6.2. SR 03-20-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

193rd Extension Page 1 of2 Maurer, Terry From: Johnson, Lori Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:55 AM To: terry.maurer@BDMCE.com; Maurer, Terry Subject: FW: 193rd Extension Terry - Please enter this in the record for the public meeting tonight. I would like to get an update from you after the two meetings. Thanks, Lori From: Craig Howse [mailto:chowse@howselaw.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:49 PM To: Johnson, Lori Subject: 193rd Extension Lori, Thank you for the update on the 193rd extension proposal. I am located at 19276 Twin Lakes Rd, and as I understand the considerations, this road could directly impact our property. Since I can not attend tomorrow night's meeting, I wish to share my general thoughts with you, and I ask that you pass them along to the City Engineer. I appreciate the City's need to create East/West corridors. The extension of 193rd would make it easier for us to access the Coburn's/Cub area of Elk River. I am not opposed to an extension per se, but I am concerned that the extension could greatly interfere with our home and family. We have lived in our present home since 1995. We moved to Elk River from Anoka purchasing 10 acres to enjoy a more rural life style (horses, 4 wheelers, kids running around, etc.) Our 5 kids definitely consider this home. Several years ago, when we discussed looking for another parcel of land, we encountered resistance from the kids. Lisa and I also like our location so we decided to invest in our property. About 3 years ago, we constructed a 72 x 40 heated out building which we use for home schooling our kids, playing basketball, hosting neighborhood parties, and a variety of other events. Last year, we invested again in the property making the decision that we would, God willing, live here for the next 20 plus years. We put an addition on the house that doubled the square footage and changed the front of the house adding a wrap around porch so we could enjoy the views from the front and east of our property. Since adding these improvements, I have learned of the possible extension. One plan, as I understand it, is to direct the extension on a straight line passing across the front of our home on a diagonal line. This would bifurcate our property and bring four lanes of traffic through our front and side yard faced by our wrap around porch. This would severely affect our property and disturb our family and home so we ask that this option not be considered. Considering the current traffic flows and the minimization of the impact on all neighbors, it seems that an extension of 193rd with a realignment down Tyler Street to Co Rd. 13 would have the least impact on all property owners. Most the houses on Tyler affected by this project are positioned to maximize their views to the West or in the direction of 193rd if extended more or less in a straight fashion. I anticipate that 1/24/2006