Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />Maurer, Terry <br /> <br />From: KEITH ERNST [keith_ernst@msn.com] <br />Sent: Friday, February 17, 20066:08 AM <br />To: Maurer, Terry; mayorer@aol.com; shortshots17@aol.com; jwgump@yahoo.com; <br />farbers5@msn.com; pmotin@aol.com <br />Subject: 193rd Ave Corridor Feedback <br /> <br />Terry Maurer 1 Elk River City Council, <br />Please consider my feedback (below) when making decisions on the 193rd corridor project. <br /> <br />Summary <br />Though I would agree there are very limited east/west routes connecting the east Elk River <br />developments with Highway 169, I am not in favor ofa 193rd Ave Corridor. I don't believe the 193rd <br />Ave route being proposed would address the east Elk River traffic issue. Even with the corridor being <br />proposed, the majority of the additional east Elk River traffic will still travel Highway 13 to Main St to <br />get on Highway 169. Thus, investment in a new highway could get more benefit elsewhere. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />Investments in east Elk River roadways should be put into a north/south route (i.e. Cty 40) for the new <br />developments. To truly minimize issues with traffic from the east into Elk River, traffic should be <br />routed south to Highway 10. By human nature, traffic will not go northwest to get to the suburbs <br />(southeast) (which would bethe case with a 193rd Ave corridor}. However, commuters will go south, <br />then west on Highway 10, to get to Highway 169/101 (by going south first they will be making <br />progress toward the suburbs). In addition, by investing in a north/south route for east Elk River traffic, <br />it will be a good step in preparation for a potential Mississippi river crossing in Dayton (and it would <br />demonstrate good vision and long-term planning). <br /> <br />Justification: <br />> It's not a good plan to route all of the new development traffic into Elk River from the east and <br />then south through Elk River on 169. Why add more unnecessary traffic to an already <br />congested section of 169. <br />> Send the traffic south to Highway 10. It can then go east through Ramsey/Anoka or west to <br />Highway 101/169. This would help avoid unnecessary through-traffic in Elk River. (They <br />would still have a route into Elk River on Cty 13 if their destination was Elk River.) <br />> Would help entice more home buyers to the east Elk River area as they would have a good <br />route to the suburbs and wouldn't have to go northwest to get southeast. <br />> Would be good planning for the future as there may be anpther south route across the <br />Mississippi in Ramsey/Dayton some day. This route would feed well to such a crossing. <br /> <br />193rd Ave Corridor <br />If a decision is still made to move forward with the 193rd Ave Corridor, I would recommend bringing <br />it through to Tyler St and directing traffic south on Tyler to Highway 13. <br /> <br />Justification: <br />> Will address the current 197th Ave residential traffic issue by providing an east-west <br /> <br />2/21/2006 <br />