Laserfiche WebLink
<br />parking and placement of utilities. Parking has typically been a concern for smaller lots, and the developer is <br />proposing restricting driveway width to 16-feet to maximize curb space for parking. The applicant has <br />included a parking study evaluating the impact of the smaller lots on available street parking. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission should discuss the proposal and the impact of the smallest lot sizes on the <br />community. The developer will provide additional background information regarding the small lots and why <br />they should be considered an alternative to attached townhomes rather than a small single-family lot. <br /> <br />Environmental <br />The site is located within the Wild and Scenic River District, which includes additional performance standards <br />and open space requirements. Generally, the standards require larger lots closer to the river, and a net open <br />space requirement for all areas within the district. The developer has been working closely with the DNR to <br />ensure the proposal satisfies the standards. <br /> <br />The attachments include additional information regarding compliance with the Wild and Scenic standards. <br />According to the exhibits and conversations with the DNR, the project complies with the ordinance, and the <br />PUD will include additional performance standards to ensure long-term compliance. <br /> <br />Additionally, due to the development’s size and location, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is <br />required. An EAW is a state mandated analysis of the impacts a proposed development project may generate. <br />It includes a wide variety of topics, including traffic, historical elements, natural features, to name a few. The <br />applicant has submitted the EAW for initial review, and the city will follow the state-mandated review <br />process. Ultimate approval of the EAW requires a review from the City Council. <br /> <br />Park and Recreations <br />The Park and Recreation Commission, the City Council, and staff have had numerous conversations regarding <br />the park dedication requirements for the subdivision. The most recent conversation on March 18, 2025, <br />recommends a combination of land and cash dedication. The land dedication includes the floodway areas along <br />the river, and a 2+ acre bluff top park that will provide additional recreational amenities. The discussion also <br />included a recommendation for $536,000 in cash dedication. <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />The requested amendment to the approved plan is generally consistent with the established guidance. The <br />changes will better align the land use guidance with property lines. This provides clear guidance for current <br />and future landowners. <br /> <br />Zone Change <br />Amendments to the approved zoning map must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The current <br />zoning is generally consistent with the approved land use map, but the requested changes will improve <br />consistency. The proposed commercial areas align with land currently guided for similar uses, and, along with <br />the requested changes, improve overall compliance. Second, the proposed residential PUD is consistent with <br />the mixed residential guidance of the plan. The zone change will also align with planned parcel lines, improving <br />overall consistency. <br /> <br />PUD Ordinance <br />The proposed PUD ordinance outlines the development standards for the subdivision. Any standards not <br />specifically noted within the PUD ordinance will follow the general development standards outlined in <br />Chapter 30. <br /> <br />Financial Impact <br />None <br /> <br />Page 26 of 55