My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-2025 Parks and Recreation Commission Packet (2)
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2021-2030
>
2025
>
04-09-2025
>
04-09-2025 Parks and Recreation Commission Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2025 4:27:57 PM
Creation date
4/4/2025 4:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
4/9/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes Page 4 <br />March 12, 2025 <br />Mr. Stremcha said roadside parking would be better alongside the orange trail by the grey square area <br />on the map. He pointed out that driving with a car would bring people through the main corridor <br />directly to the park, not the area to the north. If they would be coming in from a trail access point <br />once the MRT is complete, they would not be coming in with a car. Commissioner Niziolek asked if <br />the major interchange would be on the northern side of the development. Mr. Stremcha said yes but it <br />would still direct traffic onto the frontage road which would travel south and disperse into the <br />development. <br />Commissioner Loidolt said that he believes they shot down a perfectly good park that could host an <br />18-hole disc golf course because of on street parking. He said it was simply because there was not <br />parking. He thinks we are going to penalize the people being in this neighborhood by having on street <br />parking and not a parking lot. There will be garbage in the yards and loitering that will be an <br />inconvenience to the house owners. He feels if they want to make this a destination park for the <br />greater Elk River residents, they need the parking lot. <br />Mr. Stremcha and Mr. Shelby said that if the commission wants to recommend putting a parking lot <br />back in that area, they can whether it is the original one or a new one. <br />Commissioner Goodwin said that she thinks there needs to be a parking lot on both sides of the <br />neighborhood because realistically she is not going to park on the north side and walk with all her <br />stuff to the side with the playground. Commissioner Stewart asked how big the original parking lot on <br />the north size was. Mr. Shelby pulled up the drawing from the initial Capstone project presentation <br />and it showed 30 stalls. <br />Commissioner Loidolt asked how they would access that parking lot. Mr. Stremcha said eventually via <br />the interchange but at first it will be the main road. The service roads will all be incorporated in <br />phases as the development grows so not all in phase one. Commissioner Loidolt said that he likes the <br />plan, but they need parking lots. Chair Anderson said that it would be better with a central parking lot <br />than one on each side. They clarified that the red lines on the design represent sidewalks. <br />Mr. Stremcha asked what the commissions suggestion is on the number of parking stalls. <br />Commissioner Niziolek said that there were ten cars parked at Houlton tonight so he feels this <br />neighborhood will need at least 25 to 30. Commissioner Loidolt agreed. Commissioner Varty said that <br />they should evaluate which side would have the heaviest usage. <br />Commissioner Varty said that it may not only be people from outside the neighborhood but also <br />people within the neighborhood. Commissioner Goodwin said the type of amenities included in the <br />park will affect how many parking stalls will be needed. If they are going to have amenities where <br />multiple families are going to meet up such as a playground and picnic pavilion, then they need many <br />spots. <br />Mr. Stremcha asked how the commission would feel about having indented parking along the street <br />outside the grey park area on the map. Commissioner Niziolek said he is supportive if the parking <br />locations are designated and clear to the people purchasing the homes. <br />Commissioner Loidolt asked how much of the park land would be taken up by those parking spots. <br />Mr. Stremcha said maybe 7.5 % of the park land. Chair Anderson said he thinks that type of parking <br />Page 5 of 54
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.