My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.5 SR 03-17-2025
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2025
>
03-17-2025
>
4.5 SR 03-17-2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:25:12 PM
Creation date
3/27/2025 4:25:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/17/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONTENTS <br />WHAT IS A FRAMEWORK PLAN 1 <br />ATHLETIC FIELDS STUDY FINDINGS 1 <br />OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTS 2 <br />OAK KNOLL ATHLETIC COMPLEX CONCEPT 3 <br />DAVE ANDERSON ATHLETIC COMPLEX CONCEPT 4 <br />PLANTS AND THINGS RECREATION COMPLEX CONCEPT 5-6 <br />PROJECT PHASES AND ESTIMATES 7-8 <br />Sources: US Census, Elk River Comprehensive Plan, ESRI <br /> - <br /> 5,000 <br /> 10,000 <br /> 15,000 <br /> 20,000 <br /> 25,000 <br /> 30,000 <br />1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035DAACOKACPTRCLJWP renovationPRTC expansionPopulation Growth and Field Development in Elk River <br />WHAT IS A FRAMEWORK PLAN? <br />The Elk River Athletic Facilities Framework Plan includes an examination of the major outdoor fi eld <br />facilities in the City. Recent improvements at Lion John Weicht Park with 2 softball fi elds serve the high <br />school and to some extent the youth softball programs in Elk River, so this facility was included in fi eld <br />analysis, but is not expected to change and was not part of the design eff orts. This project looked at: <br />• Dave Anderson Athletic Complex <br />• Oak Knoll Athletic Complex (including school district property) <br />• Plants and Things Recreation Complex <br />(including an expansion area to the south of the built area) <br />The framework plan developed concepts for these facilities to a “schematic” level. Schematic design <br />allows for: <br />• Testing of ideas <br />• Assigning program <br />(how will the facility will be used?) <br />• Site fi t testing <br />(can the fi elds and related support facilities like parking fi t on the site?) <br />• Planning level cost estimating <br />(how much money do we need to allocate to realize this vision?) <br />Schematic design is early in the process, so what is built may ultimately shift somewhat from the <br />framework plan. There are still some variables that have not been resolved that could change what <br />can or should be done at the sites. In the case of this plan, this could include questions of property <br />ownership, larger than expected wetlands identifi ed by a future delineation, changing costs and/or <br />funding opportunities, changes to adjacent land uses, or unanticipated shifts in population growth. <br />What this plan allows the City to do is start moving forward with a funding strategy, knowing how much <br />these improvements will cost. It also helps the City plan for where to invest time, money, and resources <br />into existing facilities. For example, based on these designs, it would not be wise for the City to invest in <br />new buildings at DAAC, but it may make sense to continue investments to the baseball area at PTRC. <br />As the City gets closer to building out these facilities, additional design work will be needed to fi ne tune <br />layout adjustments and resolve some of the details. <br />GUIDANCE AND GOALS FOR THE FRAMEWORK PLAN <br />In order to develop the Framework Plan, goals were identifi ed and guidelines were provided. The goals <br />of this project included: <br />• Accommodate and identify locations for as many of the anticipated fi elds needed, based on the <br />2022 Athletic Fields Study <br />• Group alike facilities <br /> -Give each sport a “home” facility <br /> -Better facilitate tournaments <br />• Improve the quality of the facilities <br />• Improve facilities for maintenance and recreation programming <br />Additional guidance on what the Framework Plan should consider was also provided: <br />• Layout plans on existing City property (and some school district property at OKAC) <br />• The long term plans for adjacent land uses by DAAC are unclear and we may not always be able to <br />rely on the currently available parking. Reduce the level of intensive investment at this facility. <br />• The City has ownership of land south of the wetland complex at PTRC and this land is anticipated to <br />be a part of PTRC. Utilize this land for additional fi eld development. The boundaries of this land have <br />shifted since 2018 planning eff orts. <br />FINDINGS FROM THE <br />ATHLETIC FIELDS STUDY <br />In 2022, the City of Elk River completed a fi eld utilization <br />study. The City has been growing and user expectations <br />around fi elds have changed. The last major expansion <br />of fi eld space happened in 2005 with the expansion of <br />PTRC. At that time, the City was approximately 19,700 <br />people. Since then the population has grown to 27,393 <br />(ESRI). Growth is continuing, and at a more rapid pace <br />than anticipated. <br />The fi eld study looked at multiple variables when <br />developing recommendations for additions to the <br />system. These included: <br />• Population ratios relative to the last time fi elds were <br />added (2005) <br />• Comparisons (City only and including schools) with <br />other peer cities <br />• Participation trends in diff erent sports <br />• User Feedback <br />The study recommended the following additions: <br />• + 4 rectangle fi elds (football, soccer, lacrosse) <br />The framework plan adds 3 rectangle fi elds, and <br />increases fl exibility for programming <br />• + 3-4 60’ ballfi elds with 200-225’ fences <br />The framework plan adds 1 60’ baseball fi eld to the <br />system and 2 60’ softball fi elds <br />• + 1-2 75’ ballfi elds <br />The framework plan makes 1 90’ fi eld functional for 75’ <br />and improves another for dedicated baseball <br />• + 1-2 90’ ballfi elds <br />The framework plan does not add any 90’ baseball <br />fi elds, but the addition of turf at Hales would increase <br />capacity and one practice fi eld was added at the HS <br />during renovations <br />As noted, the framework plan does not fully address all of <br />the demand, but does improve numbers and function. <br />ELK RIVER PARKS & RECREATIONATHLETIC FIELDS FRAMEWORK PLAN <br />City of Elk River, Minnesota1 Page 51 of 304
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.