My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1 DRAFT MINUTES 03-17-2025
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2025
>
03-17-2025
>
4.1 DRAFT MINUTES 03-17-2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 4:24:27 PM
Creation date
3/27/2025 4:24:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
3/17/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />March 3, 2025 <br />--------- <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />Councilmember Calva confirmed that Items 2 and 4 on the map shown may never be part of the plan as <br />they are contingent on what happens with Ivan Sand Community Middle/High School. He asked which <br />had come first, the discussion to move the school or the desire for a ballfield? Mr. Portner gave a brief <br />background on the history of the field and school and stated the city approached the school. <br />Mayor Dietz added that he had a conversation with the ISD 278 superintendent, who stated that Oak <br />Knoll was a top priority as well as improving Hale's Field. The mayor felt that the city should be part of <br />the discussion as there is no sense updating one field without improving all of them. <br />Mayor Dietz stated that the Dave Anderson Complex (Item 6 on the map shown) should be low on the <br />priority list as it is unknown what will happen to the County Fairgrounds property. <br />Councilmember Wagner asked if an economic impact study could be performed to determine the <br />economic impact of athletic field improvements and relocation. <br />Mayor Dietz agreed that it made sense to combine similar sports fields in one area and would improve <br />the user experience for tournaments, youth organizations, and parents. <br />Mr. Anderson stated that the Parks and Recreation Commission had concerns with calling this plan a <br />"master plan" but renaming it as a "framework" helped. Key components of the Commission's concerns <br />include cost as well as the future of Ivan Sand school. <br />The Council reiterated that this plan would take 15–20 years to implement and would be done in <br />stages. <br />Katie Harstad was in attendance and the Council commended her on her work for the recent section <br />tournaments. <br />11.3 Multi-Purpose Facility Advisory Commission Powers and Duties <br />Mr. Stremcha presented the staff report. <br />Ms. Harstad stated that she has begun having check-in meetings with each user group after their season <br />or tournament to change and adapt to customer feedback. <br />The Council discussed that the current Multipurpose Facility Advisory Commission is comprised of <br />users who have a conflict of interest. <br />Councilmember Wagner stated that in the first two years of the Commission, while she was a liaison, <br />there were decisions to be made and the Commission was kept busy. They had poor communication <br />with staff and the time between meetings was too long for urgent issues. At times the Commission just <br />"rubber-stamped" decisions already made by staff. She stated that the current Commission seems to be <br />running more smoothly. <br />Councilmember Calva asked Ms. Harstad's opinion. Ms. Harstad stated she gets more value out of one- <br />on-one meetings with user groups than the Multipurpose Facility Advisory Commission meetings. She <br />stated that preparing for meetings is a lengthy process. <br />Page 7 of 304
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.