Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The intent of the city's setback requirement is to maintain a consistent appearance within neighborhoods. Our home is <br />on a cul-de-sac and has large expansive areas between neighboring dwellings. This currently allows for a pleasant view <br />regardless of uniformity. <br /> <br />The purpose of front yard setbacks is to prevent buildings from being constructed too close to the street, <br />thereby maintaining a visually cohesive and attractive streetscape. Since the property is located at the end of <br />a cul-de-sac, any deviation from this uniformity may not be readily apparent. The request aligns with the <br />general purpose and intent of the regulation. <br />2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />We're committed to ensuring the garage is aesthetically pleasing and consistent with the neighborhood's character, <br />including additional boulder landscaping to integrate it into the surroundings. <br /> <br />The property is guided as Traditional Single-Family Residential, where houses and accessory structures are <br />anticipated. The proposal aligns with the goals of the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with <br />the zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties means that: <br />3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br />ordinance; <br /> <br />The front most post to the 120 sq ft patio (the lean-to) on the street side of the garage will be positioned 20 feet from <br />the property line (10 ft inside the set back), which allows us to protect the environment and save on significant grading <br />costs. It should be noted that the proposed front left corner of the 936 sq ft structure, not the lean-to, will be no more <br />than 3 feet into the set back line. <br /> <br />The petitioner is requesting to build an accessory structure beyond the required setback to preserve several <br />mature trees on the property and minimize the necessary grading. This proposal represents a reasonable use <br />of the property that is not permitted under the current zoning ordinance. <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a consequence of the <br />petition's own action or inaction; and <br /> <br />The current proposed location for the garage requires minimal grading of an existing hill, preserving the natural <br />topography and existing mature trees. Meeting the standard setback would necessitate extensive hill grading leading to <br />significant increased costs, engineered boulder retaining walls and the unnecessary removal of numerous trees, which <br />would significantly impact the natural beauty and ecosystem of the property. <br /> <br />The property’s unique characteristics include steep grades and mature trees. Meeting the setback <br />requirements would necessitate significant grading and the removal of several trees. <br />5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> <br />Granting this variance is not only a cost-effective solution but also an environmentally responsible decision. Our home is <br />situated on a cul-de-sac with homes that are not closely adjacent to one another, which means our garage will not <br />disrupt the visual harmony or proximity that the setback rule intends to preserve. It supports our commitment to <br />sustainability and community values. We're dedicated to complying with all other zoning and building codes to enhance <br />Page 7 of 14