7.2 SR 06-17-2024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

dust, where manure and shelter were going to be located, and wanted to know if a survey would be required for a fence. They requested more details regarding the location of these items. The commission discussed where the structure, manure, and feeding/water area should be located to limit negative effects on neighboring properties. The commission recommended the shelter, feeding location, and water source be no less than 200 feet from any existing residence. The applicant submitted an updated plan and staff created the staff site plan based on their information. Since the commission meeting, the neighbor to the south asked several questions. Is there an MPCA residential management plan that is relevant and, if not, could it be clarified what manure management guidelines would apply in this case? Could the CUP be rescinded if the applicant fails to maintain their CUP requirements or if unanticipated problems arise after the permit is issued? What recourse do residents in the vicinity of the permit holder have if the permit turns out to not be compatible with the affected homeowners? It has been his experience that once a problem is established in a residential neighborhood it can be hard to resolve and, hoping, any issues will be addressed before they can affect the neighbors. The city's environment staff and consultant have been working on a plan with guidance from Sherburne County's Solid Waste Management Ordinance. Violations of the approved conditions and/or applicable ordinances could result in the CUP being revoked. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. Financial Impact None Mission/Policy/Goal Support the growth and development of the community. Attachments I. Applicants Updated Site Plan 2. Staff Site Plan 6-17-2024 3. Manure Management Plan 4. CU 24-08 Conditional Use Permit 5. Planning Commission Memo dated 05-28-2024 6. 7.2 Bedbury Presentation Page 168 of 372