My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-2024 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2020 - 2029
>
2024
>
07-23-2024 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 8:39:37 AM
Creation date
9/25/2024 8:39:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
7/23/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 23, 2024 <br />--------- <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />pipes at a cost that far outweighs what the developer is willing to pay. She stated they met with staff <br />who explained it may be possible to connect at some capacity but not the full 200 acres that was <br />proposed to be developed, without the developer investing in larger pipe. She explained that installing <br />larger pipes would allow future developers - i.e. their competitors - to benefit from that extension at a <br />much lower cost. This proposal with 1 acre lots offers an option to still develop the property, bringing <br />some tax base to the city, and provides a transition between Miske Meadows and the larger lots in <br />Nowthen. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlton noted that in the past, the city has charged trunk area assessments as properties were <br />developed. He stated there are options, but the question is who bears the cost of installing the entire <br />trunk system, as you can't just install put part of a trunk line. What is the cost burden that the <br />developer could bear and where is the gap and the city could fill in a mechanism if we wanted to keep <br />the land use guided for urban residential. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rydberg is in favor of having future developers connect to the trunk line but felt the city <br />would end up being the "bank" holding the debt until future developers added on. He felt it important <br />to make the process equitable for all developers. His question was, are there areas surrounding this <br />that could be developed in the future? <br /> <br />Mr. Carlton stated the northeastern utility area expansion site does get into a number of those costs, <br />how many developable acres are available, number of units, and estimated cost of these utilities. <br /> <br />Chair Beise and Commissioner Mauren agreed with Commissioner Rydberg's comments. <br /> <br />After discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they would like to see this area <br />guided as an urban residential area with city services (city sewer and water) and to further continue <br />conversations with the developer, city council, and utilities to evaluate and find financial solutions to <br />make it fair to developers to support installing the trunk line. <br /> <br />Ms. Lindahl stated the same concerns exist for both sewer and water, but t\he cost of this is out of <br />scale because such a large part of the land is unbuildable due to wetlands. She appreciated the support <br />to extend services and share costs as they cannot front load costs even with the assessments to the <br />properties. She stated ultimately, if the council cannot support the extension costs, she suggested <br />removing this area out of the urban service district. <br /> <br />Commissioner Booth noted he preferred the application be allowed a 1-acre lot with septic and well. <br />He lived in this area and was concerned about the number of wetlands creating a large amount of <br />undevelopable area, and would suggest removing the area from the urban service district if unable to <br />complete extension of services. <br /> <br /> 8.2 Concept Review: The Specht Family Farm Housing Development <br /> Mr. Carlton presented the staff report. He distributed a letter from the Minnesota Historical Society <br />(MHS) containing comments on the proposed development adjacent to their property. He introduced <br />the development team from Capstone Homes, consisting of Stephen Bona, Matt Barker, Heather <br />Lorch, and Kenny Novak. He also introduced Brian Krystofiak, PE, and Ryan Ruttger, PLA, <br />with Carlson McCain. Erwin and Marilyn Specht were present representing the landowners. <br /> <br />Mr. Bona provided a PowerPoint presentation to explain the history of the Specht farming operations,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.