My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-2024 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2020 - 2029
>
2024
>
04-23-2024 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2024 4:15:15 PM
Creation date
9/24/2024 4:15:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
4/23/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />April 23, 2024 <br />--------- <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> Mr. Leeseberg presented the staff report. He stated the applicant is requesting informal, non-binding <br />feedback regarding this proposed residential apartment project. <br /> <br />Jared Ackmann with Rueter Walton presented details regarding the proposed housing project. He <br />stated the property is under contract with the current owner and is looking for feedback from the city. <br />He provided a background on Rueter Walton and projects they've built in the Twin Cities. He reviewed <br />the site itself and felt the natural topography and tree coverage naturally screened the building from <br />neighboring properties. Based upon feedback from the neighborhood meeting, they made two minor <br />adjustments; one change was to add a privacy fence along the eastern side of the property adjacent to <br />the garages to help with screening; the other change was moving the dog run to the southwest corner <br />of the property. He stated they will be asking the city for a parking variance to the parking ordinance to <br />allow for 1.88 stalls per unit as they feel their request would provide sufficient parking spaces to the <br />point of being over parked. He stated this request is backed up from data on other family-style housing <br />projects they've built, and along with parking studies, stated these current projects use 1.3 to 1.6 <br />parking stalls with no issues. He stated Elk River has a stronger, outdated parking ordinance. Mr. <br />Ackmann then went into the covered parking requirement and will be proposing 30 covered stalls; the <br />city requires 96. He indicated it comes down to financial feasibility and the cost for one covered parking <br />unit is $25,000. The market doesn't allow the necessary rent to cover the cost of constructing covered <br />parking for all units and it isn't financially feasible. He outlined the amenity package for tenants such as a <br />playground, fitness center, in-unit laundry, community areas, and noted these were high quality housing <br />amenities. He stated they would be applying to the state for tax-exempt bonds that would allow them <br />to sell for tax credits to finance the project. He stated with this financing, that they would be restricted <br />to income that renters could make, and the rent charged, which would be 60% Area Median Income <br />(AMI) as dictated by Sherburne County. Mr. Ackmann outlined the proposed rents and explained the <br />goal of this project was to provide affordable housing for the 'missing middle' workforce housing. He <br />noted the current market of homes for sale and stated this project provides another housing option for <br />young families or couples trying to work or live in the area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mauren asked for more clarification on AMI and asked if this was considered low- <br />income housing. Mr. Ackmann explained Sherburne County is lumped into the metropolitan counties <br />when calculating the midpoint of a metropolitan area's income distribution, which is 60% of the average <br />median income. Therefore, income cannot be more than $52,200 for an individual, $59,640 for 2 adults. <br />This allows Rueter Walton to get a grant to lower the costs of rent to offset the costs of development. <br />Mr. Ackmann states it does restrict their rental pool. They utilize a management company that does a <br />rigorous income verification process to ensure compliance of renters. Mr. Ackmann explained this type <br />of program is called Section 42 housing, where the tax credit encourages developers to build affordable <br />housing to meet the need of the community. He stated CommonBond was a similar project in Elk <br />River, which went through Minnesota Housing; this project would go through the state. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission then provided feedback on the concept plans submitted. They discussed the <br />following: <br />▪ Parking requirements - typically 2-1 requirement with proof of parking, which shows where they <br />could build additional parking spots should they need it <br />▪ Parking lot design and snow removal/storage <br />▪ Landscape plan and stormwater plan - need more infomation <br />▪ Local motorcycle dealership on-street overflow parking - busy roadway
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.