Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />August 5, 2024 <br />--------- <br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner asked where the suggested rates put us within the budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Stremcha explained many variables will come into play with this budget cycle, such as the <br />restructuring of the organizational chart, and the concession expansion with the catering and liquor <br />components. He feels with the changes there will be a step towards solvency. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz recommended $250 prime, $200 non-prime, and $150 school. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mike Westgaard stated that we are comparing a small pool of facilities to about 65 <br />facilities that are members. He came up with about 52 facilities that were comparable and came up with <br />an average of $231. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer brought up the question of which facilities are subsidized and which are not. <br />Commissioner Mike Westgaard stated they are all different. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mike Westgaard further said that they knew there would be an increase, and they <br />expected there would be an increase. However, a $20 or $30 increase is quite substantial. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner explained the reason we got into this situation was because of the discounted <br />groups and stated that whatever the number is, it has to make sense across the board. She posed the <br />question: how do we solve the problem unless we come up with a standard that is transparent for <br />everyone to see who is paying what? She further said, this facility will not be subsidized by tax dollars. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grupa suggested $250 prime, $185 non-prime, and $165 school. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz agrees with Councilmember Wagner that we are different in the fact that we are trying to <br />be net-zero and not to have taxpayers pay. He stated that we told the taxpayers we were going to do <br />this and at the end of the day, the Council is responsible for making the decision. He stated we have a <br />state-of-the-art facility and we have to charge accordingly. He agrees with Councilmember Grupa's <br />suggestion for $250 prime, $185 non-prime, and $165 school. <br /> <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated at the end of the day, if we are going to run this like a business so it <br />is not subsidized, then revenues and expenditures have to balance and you need your customers so <br />there has to be a happy medium in all of it (handed out his research). We need to take a look at the <br />facility as a whole. <br /> <br />Councilmember Westgaard added that he is more concerned about the turf rates instead of the ice <br />rates and posed the question if the turf groups would pay the increased rates. Mr. Stremcha stated it <br />will come down to the variable if the user groups are willing to stay versus drive to other facilities. <br />Councilmember Westgaard continued to ask, what is it we want to do, and what do we hope to <br />generate in ice revenue? What do we expect to do with our largest customer? He does believe there <br />should be some sort of arrangement or commitment from the biggest user groups stating how much ice <br />they intend to use in order to budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wagner stated we can go back to the taxpayers asking to make this a subsidized <br />community center and state it would be due to the fact of inflation, or we can wait to see what changes <br />the new facility manager and assistant facility manager will make to reduce rates, but right now we have <br />to figure out rates, so the user groups can plan their budgets and the city can plan their budget. At the