My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Parks and Recreation Commission Pacekt 06-12-2024 (3)
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2021-2030
>
2024
>
06-12-2024
>
Parks and Recreation Commission Pacekt 06-12-2024 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2024 2:33:49 PM
Creation date
8/19/2024 2:33:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
6/12/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes Page 3 <br />May 8, 2024 <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Anderson asked if the plan is to bring this forward to next month’s meeting as an action item <br />and if so, Chair Anderson would like to visit the site and see it staked out. Mr. Churchill explained <br />that he did have it painted out, but the rain washed it out, but he can get it marked out again. <br /> <br />He could design the course to just stay in the grassy area, but he would like to bring riders up into the <br />woods a bit. Chair Anderson asked when the new trail could get up and running. Mr. Churchill said <br />they could get it up and running with dirt work and rocks this year. If he could get a dump truck or <br />two of black dirt work that would help, and all the extra things could wait. <br /> <br />Mr. Stremcha referenced the Hillside Park master plan amenities and how they would fit into this <br />plan. Mr. Churchill said he had not seen the master plan before. Commissioner Niziolek said that it is <br />imperative that Mr. Churchill review the master plan before they move forward. Chair Anderson <br />questioned how the trail could hinder future development if it were built now. <br /> <br />Mr. Churchill will review the master plan so all these concerns can be addressed when it is presented <br />as an action item at the next meeting. Mr. Stremcha shared that the master plan is available via the <br />City of Elk River website and that there is just a wish list of amenities for the park based on user <br />input. The commission would like the master plan link sent to them to review before the next <br />meeting. <br /> <br />8.2 Sherburne County Collaboration: Great Northern Regional Trail <br /> <br />Gina Hugo, Sherburne County Parks Director, presented her report and slide show of the Great <br />Northern Regional Trail Partnership and legacy grant funding proposal. <br /> <br />Mrs. Hugo explained that the GNT is a recreational resource shared between five agencies. The GNT <br />corridor affects many stakeholders over a span of 30 miles from Elk River to Milaca. During the first <br />year of the partnership, in 2020, a Memorandum of Understanding between an initial four agencies <br />was set up to create the framework for the future. In 2023 the MOU was updated, and a master plan <br />has been created. Now, in 2024 the focus is on the legacy grant proposal. <br /> <br />Mrs. Hugo explained that the current trail head begins in Elk River at County Rd 1. Commissioner <br />Niziolek suggested shifting this spot to the access coming out of Meadowvale Rd. where most trail <br />users park and hop onto the trail from there. Mrs. Hugo explained that there would be additional <br />public engagement to gather input on these types of things. Chair Anderson suggested including the <br />school district with the public engagement piece as well. Chair Anderson said that feature three would <br />have concerns for ski trail groomers in the winter to have space to turn around and make that loop. <br />Commissioner Niziolek pointed out there could be issues with power lines in that area as far as the <br />structures are concerned and they may have to go further north or south. <br /> <br />Features three and four in Mrs. Hugos presentation would include limiter gates which would serve the <br />importance of creating physical barriers to make cyclists to slow down before approaching roads and <br />to keep motorized vehicles off the trail. Commissioner Niziolek asked about the proximity of the road <br />to the limiter gates. Mrs. Hugo was not sure of the distance yet but that would be determined further <br />into the design process. Commissioner Niziolek shared concerns about the grade separation between <br />the trail and the road. Mrs. Hugo said that concern could be addressed. <br /> <br />Page 5 of 27
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.