Laserfiche WebLink
Ji <br />Elk River amft . <br />Municipal Utilities UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />ERMU Commission <br />Mark Hanson —General Manager <br />MEETING DATE: <br />AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />August 13, 2024 <br />5.6 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Future of ERMU Power Plant <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />Discussion Only <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities (ERMU) has maintained the existing power plant since its <br />construction in 1947. The original two engines, with a combined generating capacity of 1.1 <br />megawatts (MW) of electricity supplied power to the village of Elk River until 1961 when a third <br />engine, with a generating capacity of 3.0 MW, joined them. The final engine, with a generating <br />capacity of 5.0 MW, was installed in 1972. However, by the mid-1970s, large-scale power <br />generation plants and transmission lines created the availability of inexpensive, reliable power. <br />By 1978, Elk River met all their power needs through a cooperative purchasing agency. Since <br />then, the plant has been maintained for auxiliary purposes only. <br />For the last 40+ years, the engines have run for 60-120 minutes once a month to test their <br />operational status. Unfortunately, the intermittent, short duration run times associated with <br />these backup generation test runs are the worst possible scenario for engines of this era. These <br />engines were built to reach operating temperature and run for long periods of time. The large <br />temperature swings associated with intermittent runs are extremely tough on the lubrication <br />and cooling systems. Not surprisingly, costs to maintain the engines have continued to rise. <br />Additionally, since we do not have full-time staff dedicated to the operation and maintenance <br />of these engines they will only continue to decline. <br />In late 2022, staff explored an opportunity via a Midcontinent Independent System Operator <br />(MISO) emergency demand response (EDR) program to create a revenue stream to offset the <br />increasing maintenance costs of the engines. The requirements of the EDR program proved too <br />complex so the enrollment effort was postponed until pending changes were better <br />understood. Since then, MISO has increased both their reliability criteria, their fees for <br />noncompliance, and lowered their potential revenue payouts. As such, the EDR program is <br />considerably less attractive, especially given the current condition (reliability) of our engines. <br />Lastly, the generators have limited value as a backup power source due to the significant <br />redundancy within our own distribution network and within GRE's transmission network <br />achieved over the last 40 years. All our substations have multiple interconnected transmission <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />97 <br />