My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.2 EMRUSR 08-13-2024
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2024
>
08-13-2024
>
2.2 EMRUSR 08-13-2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2024 2:26:01 PM
Creation date
8/13/2024 11:07:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/13/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
$135,000. Mr. Hanson estimated that would allow the plan to begin around mid -August. <br />There was no dissent from the Commission. <br />Commissioner Zerwas inquired as to what it would look like to hold the $135,000 <br />budgeted funds to be put towards a January 1, 2025, effective date. <br />Mr. Hanson replied that approach negates the data in the table as it would require the full <br />implementation cost for the first year of the plan with the addition of any wage <br />adjustment. Mr. Hanson restated that the cost advantage in implementing the current <br />step plan in 2024 is the budgeted amount limits the total first year implementation cost to <br />only the last four months of the year. <br />Ms. Towne explained that the cost advantage is due to the one-time cost to change <br />people over to the new plan. She added that wage data is perishable and delaying <br />implementation could mean going from meeting the market to an estimated lag of about <br />5 percent. <br />There was discussion about how step increases would be initiated going forward; whether <br />they would occur on a calendar year cycle or at the anniversary date as they currently <br />occur. This is to be decided after plan approval. <br />Commissioner Westgaard proposed the Commission consider selecting a market leading <br />plan, with the current step implementation, and an effective date of August 27 based on <br />pay periods and budget calculations. <br />Chair Dietz stated that he was not prepared to vote until he receives more information on <br />the comparable utilities' performance incentive programs. He asked to see a chart of the <br />actual percentage of payout from previous years and be provided details about the other <br />six comparable utilities performance compensation plans. <br />Commissioner Stewart asked the rest of the Commission if they were prepared to vote. <br />Commissioner Zerwas stated he was fine with the August 2024 start to the plan but added <br />that he doesn't want to force a vote if a member does not feel prepared to vote. <br />Commissioner Bell stated he would like to discuss the UPMIC further. <br />Chair Dietz reiterated that he wanted to hear more about other utilities. <br />Ms. Towne again recommended keeping base pay and benefits decisions separate. <br />Commissioner Stewart reminded the group that any changes to the UPMIC could not be <br />made until later in 2024 for a 2025 measurement period, suggesting the UPMIC could be <br />updated even with an approved payment plan. <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Meeting Minutes <br />July 9, 2024 <br />Page 7 <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.