Laserfiche WebLink
HANDOUT AT MEETING - 2024-7 - 5.1 <br />plan, but not as many as the proposed 9-step plan. This ensures that employees receive regular <br />pay increases while maintaining the perception of meaningful progression. <br />• Pay Plan "A" <br />o Maxes out at the former Step 9 amounts presented in June <br />o Represents a slightly market leading plan (14.9% average increase) <br />o Positions ERMU's pay at approximately 2% above market average at Step 7 <br />• Pay Plan "B" <br />o Maxes out at the former Step 8 amounts presented in June <br />o Represents a slightly market lagging plan (10.9% average increase) <br />o Positions ERMU's pay at approximately 2% below market average at Step 7 <br />Associated implementation scenarios for each plan will also be provided. Three revised <br />implementation scenarios are described below. Regardless of which scenario is selected, no <br />employee would transition into a step that results in a pay decrease. The first attachment <br />provides comparative examples for each scenario. <br />1) Scenario 1: Closest Step without a Decrease. This scenario places employees at the <br />closest higher step from their current salary, ensuring no reduction in pay while aligning <br />with the new pay plan. <br />2) Scenario 2: Stay on Current Step. This scenario keeps all employees at their current step <br />level. Since Step 5 employees would increase to the new max over three years (Steps 5- <br />7), this option most closely resembles the transition process presented to the <br />commission in November 2023. <br />3) Scenario 3: Steps based on years in position. This scenario only looks at the number of <br />years spent in their current position, regardless of current step or prior experience. Due <br />to their similarity to Scenario 2, costs for this option are not included in this report. <br />Commission members asked staff to research which of the comparable peers surveyed in the <br />study also had a performance -based incentive (PBI) program. Of the ten peer utilities surveyed, <br />six have existing PBI programs. Of the four utilities that did not currently have a PBI program, <br />two stated they were interested in creating one. <br />As a follow-up question, staff was asked to estimate the implementation costs over the next <br />three years, assuming a 4% cost of living adjustment (COLA) and a 2080-hour work year. The <br />average monthly impact to ERMU's roughly 19,000 metered accounts is also provided. Scenario <br />1 assumes backpay to early January 2024 since the $135K budgeted for comp study transition <br />costs exceeds the 2024 implementation cost. Scenario 2 assumes a delayed effective date to <br />prevent the 2024 implementation costs from exceeding the budgeted transition amount. <br />Pay Plan A: Step 7 = Former Column 9 (Slightly Market Leading) <br />1) Closest Step <br />2024 <br />2025 <br />2026 <br />2027 <br />Total <br />Transition <br />$135,000* <br />$217,659 <br />$162,843 <br />$121,045 <br />$641,015 <br />4% COLA <br />$0 <br />$8,706 <br />$6,514 <br />$4,842 <br />$20,062 <br />Total: <br />$135,000 <br />$226,365 <br />$169,356 <br />$125,887 <br />$661,077 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />