My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JOINT FINANCE COMMITEE PACKET 04-30-2024
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Joint Finance Committee
>
Packets
>
2024
>
04-30-2024
>
JOINT FINANCE COMMITEE PACKET 04-30-2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2024 11:54:46 AM
Creation date
4/29/2024 11:51:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
4/30/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Total Estimated Net Tax Increment Present Value with <br />5% interest rate $1,058,720 <br />Portion of Land Purchase Price Required Upfront or via <br />Shortfall Agreement $347,140 <br />Portion of Land Purchase Price as Write Down $1,025,000 <br />Estimated Interest Payment $379,662 <br /> <br /> <br />The developer has also indicated the potential for a 40,000 square foot building expansion. Should the building <br />expansion occur during the term of the TIF District and generate additional revenues sufficient to repay the City’s <br />interfund loan in full plus interest at 3.5% or 5% (actual interest rate TBD), there may be consideration to increase <br />the interfund loan amount at that time to reimburse the developer for the initial upfront purchase. Additional <br />discussion on potential feasibility anticipated to occur. <br /> <br />An alternate option to adjusting the upfront purchase price based on availability of tax increment revenues would <br />be to incorporate a shortfall payment formula that could be calculated on either an annual basis or at a future <br />determined time (tied to construction of expansion and/or completion of TIF District). As illustrated in the table <br />below, construction of the building expansion is expected to generate additional increment that is expected to be <br />sufficient to support repayment of the full land write down amount of $1,372,140 plus interest (TBD). <br /> <br />Table 3: Additional Land Repayment Options <br /> <br />Land Purchase Price $1,372,140 <br /> <br />Total Estimated Net Tax Increment and Present Value with <br />0% interest rate $1,854,232 <br />Total Estimated Interest Payments (0%) $0 <br />Total Estimated Net Tax Increment Present Value with <br />3.5% interest rate $1,466,353 <br />Total Estimated Interest Payments (3.5%) $339,593 <br />Total Estimated Net Tax Increment Present Value with <br />5% interest rate $1,331,916 <br />Total Estimated Interest Payments (5%) $532,953 <br /> <br />Financial Needs Analysis) <br />Upon approval of a TIF district and project, the City must make several findings, including the “but for” test: that <br />the proposed development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within <br />the reasonably foreseeable future. The developer has stated that without assistance being provided as upfront <br />through land write down, the project would not be able to secure the structure and level of debt financing <br />necessary for the project to be viable due to the following factors: 1) using equity to pay for upfront land costs <br />would impact HMI’s working capital. It would rely on higher cost funding and potential hinder future abilities to <br />remain price competitive and subject it to less reliable source of working capital to support operations, 2) the bank <br />would require higher equity investment from PLM properties if upfront assistance were not provided. This may <br />strain or limit the project scope due to capital constraints, 3) there are limitations on the level of bank financing <br />the project can secure due to the size of the capital investment and project. The developer’s submittals have <br />indicated that the upfront land write would alleviate the financing risks and concerns, provide PLM with the <br />necessary financial stability to secure a more favorable loan structure with a lower debt burden that would allow <br />HMI to maintain sufficient cash flow to meet operational needs, and to ensure business continuity during <br />construction of the project. Additionally, reduced equity requirements from the bank resulting from land write down <br />and availability of more working capital may allow PLM properties to accelerate the possibility of constructing the <br />40,000 square foot expansion. <br /> <br />Based on the developer’s stated position relative to the need for tax increment financing assistance, the City <br />could make its “but for” finding and provide tax increment assistance. We recommend, however, that the City
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.