My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1 SR 01-02-2024
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2024
>
01-02-2024
>
7.1 SR 01-02-2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2023 3:02:45 PM
Creation date
12/28/2023 2:57:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/2/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Who Should Pay Fees? <br /> <br />Council can set fees to fully recover the cost of a service or set a lower fee to provide a certain level of <br />subsidy, or alternatively, reduce costs by reducing the level of service. <br /> <br />Some programs and services may justify a subsidy from a tax based or alternative revenue source. For <br />example, community supported public services based on social, safety, or general community welfare. <br />Services supporting the general public, such as public safety, are supported by tax and other non-fee <br />revenues, while services more elective in nature and of specific benefit to individuals are typically <br />supported by charging fees to the user. <br /> <br />Within the services typically funded by user fees, there are several reasons a Council may not advocate for <br />full cost recovery of services. The following factors are some key policy considerations when setting fees <br />at less than 100 percent of cost recovery: <br /> <br /> Encouragement of desired behaviors. Keeping fees for certain services below full cost recovery <br />may provide better compliance from the community. For example, if the cost of a permit for a <br />residential tree removal is higher than the cost of the actual removal of the tree, many citizens will <br />avoid getting the permit. <br /> <br /> Effect on demand for a particular service. Sometimes raising the “price” charged for services <br />might reduce the number of participants in a program. This is largely the case in recreation programs <br />such as camps or enrichment classes, where participants often compare the city’s fees to surrounding <br />jurisdictions or other options for leisure activities. <br /> <br /> Benefit received by user of the service and the community at large is mutual. Many services <br />that directly benefit a group or individual equally benefit the community as a whole. Examples <br />include recreation programs, planning design review, historical dedications, and certain types of <br />special events. <br /> <br />Who Benefits Type of Service Tax v Fees Policy Example Services <br />Community Public 100% taxes Police patrol <br />Primarily the community with Public/Private Mostly taxes and some Code enforcement <br />some individual benefits fees <br />Primarily individual with some Private/Public Mostly fees and some Youth sports <br />community wide benefits taxes <br />Individual benefit only Private 100% fees Development services <br /> <br />When reviewing fees keep in mind which fees should be supported and subsidized and which should be <br />privately paid. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.