My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.3 SR 12-18-2023
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2023
>
12-18-2023
>
7.3 SR 12-18-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2023 10:35:38 AM
Creation date
12/14/2023 10:13:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/18/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Other than the applicant, no one spoke for or against the request and staff has not received anyT comments since <br />the commission meeting. The applicant stated he owns Sales Ramp LLC, also operating within the same building, <br />and is requesting this CUP to support his online auto part business, E&Y Auto Parts. He indicated a third tenant's <br />lease within suite B will expire in one year and Class C Components (industrial hardware) within suite C plan to <br />expand into that space. The applicant does not believe parking will be of concern as the uses will not generate the <br />expected parking demand. <br />The commission recommended that curb and gutter be installed on all driving and parking areas as �vell as around <br />the outdoor storage area. The commission also asked staff about the Copart salvage �Tard, across Jarvis Street, and <br />what the standaYds that were applied to their business. CopaYt was Yequired to install a 100% opaque 8-foot-tall <br />fence along Jarvis Street and foY 500 feet along the Yailroad with the Yemaining 100% opaque perimeteY fencing not <br />being less than six feet Copart `vas not required to put in both screening and curb/gutter. Staff recommend that <br />the condition of curb/gutter around the outdoor storage area be removed as the fencing �uill screen and contain the <br />proposed storage area. <br />The Commission had general questions on parking and staff noted that parking is based on the square footage of <br />uses. Conditional Use PeYmits stayr with the property; not the business, and while paYking needs today may be met, <br />future businesses' needs ma�T not. <br />While the Commission had no issue with the vacant lot being utilized, they wanted a proof of parking e�ibit <br />demonstrating that the propertyT the building and proposed operations are located on can support all the required <br />parking for the current, proposed, and future uses. An alternative to proof of parking could also be a requirement <br />to combine the two parcels, creating ample parking space for the current and future uses. <br />The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval with the conditions listed above. <br />Since the Planning Commission meeting, staff spoke with the propernT o`vner regarding an advertisement for <br />parking spaces allowing people to store cars and/or trucks. This use has not been permitted and the applicant has <br />since Yemoved that adveYtisement. <br />As the applicant has applied for their CUP after beginning operation, which is not uncommon, staff recommends a <br />deadline for compliance with the conditions to ensure the requirements of the CUP are completed in a timel�T <br />manner. CUPs issued prior to the start of business operations have two years to substantiall�r complete all <br />Yequirements before a business can opeYate on the pYopeYtyr. <br />Financial Impact <br />None <br />Mission/Policy/Goal <br />■ Meet changing needs - Agile <br />■ Ethical, efficient, and responsible <br />Attachments <br />■ Proof of Parking Exhibit <br />■ Planning Commission Memo dated November 28, 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.