My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3 ERMU 12-12-2023
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2023
>
12-12-2023
>
5.3 ERMU 12-12-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 9:42:34 AM
Creation date
12/8/2023 3:10:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
12/12/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />ERMU Commission <br />Mark Hanson — General Manager <br />MEETING DATE: <br />AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />December 12, 2023 <br />5.3 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Compensation Study Update <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />Approve Compensation Study Professional Services Agreement with Baker Tilley <br />BACKGROUND: <br />At the October 2023 commission meeting, staff presented an in-house, utility -wide <br />compensation study as part of the Wage & Benefit Committee update. After discussion and <br />clarifying questions, the Commission directed staff to identify a third -party consultant to <br />conduct a compensation study with all ERMU positions reviewed. For 2024 budget planning, <br />staff were also directed to include $30-$40K for consultant fees and $133K for possible salary <br />adjustments (pending study results). <br />DISCUSSION: <br />HR Generalist Megan Zachman and General Manager Mark Hanson met with, and received <br />proposals from, three industry leading public sector compensation consultants: DDA Consulting, <br />Gallagher Consulting, and Baker Tilley. Consultants were interviewed to provide additional <br />insight into their process, timeline, and experience. The interviews also focused on their <br />approach to resolving differences with potential comparable utilities regarding geographic <br />location, utility size/type, and competing labor markets. The table below summarizes the <br />proposed fees, as well as the identified pros and cons, for each of the three consultants. <br />Name <br />Fee <br />Pros <br />Cons <br />DDA <br />$19,475 <br />Price; local <br />Least adaptable process to <br />manager/analyst; shortest <br />account for unique positions, <br />timeline <br />geographic challenges, and <br />local market conditions <br />Baker <br />$25,100 <br />Experience; adaptability; <br />Manager is not local (but <br />Tilley <br />semi -local; moderate fee <br />analyst is) <br />Gallagher <br />$35,500 <br />Utility -arena experience; <br />Price; national firm with non - <br />adaptability <br />local analysts/managers; <br />longest timeline <br />Page Iof2 <br />151 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.