Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Dietz presented the proposed wage increase update. The committee agreed to <br />propose a 4.0% wage adjustment for 2024 as opposed to the metro average plus a dollar <br />which was originally requested by staff. <br />Chair Dietz initiated a discussion regarding the Review of the Annual Wage & Benefits <br />Evaluation Process as outlined in document 5.3b. He stated that he would prefer all <br />commissioners attend an open wage and benefits meeting in order to hear information <br />presented firsthand as opposed to the current committee summary process. <br />Commissioner Bell asked Chair Dietz to clarify when this meeting would be held if all <br />commissioners would need to be present. Chair Dietz replied it would be a special <br />meeting one hour prior to the regular meeting. <br />Chair Dietz asked ERMU's attorney, Mr. Shepherd, to clarify if the Wage & Benefits <br />committee should be an open or closed meeting. Mr. Shepard stated the Wage & Benefits <br />committee should follow Open Meeting Law since the committee meets regularly once a <br />year and is a sub -committee of the commission. <br />Mr. Hanson presented historical information to give context to the origin of ERMU's Wage <br />& Benefits Committee (WBC) meetings. Mr. Hanson noted that the idea for a WBC came <br />in 2011 from a process being practiced at Shakopee Public Utility. Starting in 2011, <br />ERMU's committee meetings were not posted for two reasons. The first was related to <br />confidentiality concerns over wage and benefits information. Mr. Hanson clarified that <br />legal counsel has now informed him that this is not proper procedure and moving forward <br />WBC meetings will be posted. The second reason cited for a closed meeting was based on <br />previous legal counsel concerns over dialog between non -management staff potentially <br />being considered collective bargaining. Mr. Hanson deferred to ERMU's attorney for <br />guidance regarding the collective bargaining concerns. Mr. Shepherd stated that, in <br />general, the collective bargaining concern isn't a factor. <br />Commissioner Stewart asked if Open Meeting Law would then apply to all sub -committee <br />meetings moving forward including the Information Security Committee noting their <br />discussions include cybersecurity details. Mr. Shepherd responded that all sub -committee <br />meetings should follow Open Meeting Law as the default, however, due to the safety and <br />security nature of cybersecurity it would be acceptable to close that meeting. <br />After thorough discussion, the consensus from the Commission regarding the Review of <br />the Annual Wage & Benefits Evaluation Process as outlined in document 5.3b was to <br />continue the process as it is with legal counsel's recommended update to the posting <br />procedure. <br />Mr. Hanson presented his compensation study for commission consideration noting that <br />the last full compensation study was completed in 2008-2009. Mr. Hanson explained the <br />inspiration to conduct his study came from concerns and feedback brought forth from the <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Meeting Minutes <br />October 10, 2023 <br />Page 6 <br />IN <br />