My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11.6 SR 11-06-2023
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2021 - 2030
>
2023
>
11-06-2023
>
11.6 SR 11-06-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2023 10:07:56 AM
Creation date
11/3/2023 10:04:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/6/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Action <br />To Item Number <br />Mayor and City Council 9.4 <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Work Session December 21, 2015 Tina Allard, City Clerk <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Attendance for Boards�Commissions Cal Portner, Cit � Administrator <br />Reviewed by <br />Action Requested <br />Provide staff with direction on changes to the Advisory Board and Commission Policy with regards to <br />attendance. <br />Background/Discussion <br />Mayor Dietz asked to have a discussion about absenteeism for boards/commissions. <br />1. What does the Council expect of a member in terms of attendance? Policy can outline what <br />is expected in terms of minimum requirements and the consequences when they are not met. <br />2. Should absences be excused? Current policy lacks criteria on defining an excusable absence. Is <br />missing an important, unscheduled business meeting, a child's big game, materniry leave, or a <br />death of a relative or friend excusable? <br />A member can have difficultyJ being fully informed and representing the community when they are <br />habitually absent. Not having a full board can leave the board short of multiple perspectives that help <br />contribute to better decisions representative of the community. In terms of getting the board's business <br />done, whether a missing member is eXcused or absent doesn't make any difference because the member <br />isn't there to par�icipate, ask questions, and vote. <br />Policy LanguaQe Con.rideratian.r <br />The Council could consider language based on unnoticed�noticed absences over eXcused absences or set <br />an automatic termination based on the number of absences regardless of excuse or notice. The policy <br />could outline some of the following: <br />■ A member would need to provide at least 72 hours' notice to the staff liaison, and <br />■ A member who misses 5 meetings in a rolling calendar year, regardless of notice, is automatically <br />terminated; or <br />■ Members shall be automatically removed for lack of attendance. Lack of attendance is defined as <br />missing 3 meetings (or one-third for those boards who meet on less than a monthly basis) in a <br />calendar year. <br />There are certain boards, such as HRA and EDA, which have specific statutes requirements and would <br />not be subject to the city policy for absenteeism. <br />Also note, changes to the attendance policy wouldn't necessarily be a cure-all. Attendance problems can <br />be a sign of other problems besides a member's life obligations getting in the way. Failure to regularly <br />r�wERfO �r <br />Template Updated 4/14 �����'� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.