4.3. PCSR 07-25-2023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Aegir Meeting April 12, 2023 with Mark Pistulka and Chris Leeseberg Representatives from Aegir discussed their plans to take down walls and a false ceiling in the back (south) section of their building. Currently, this section of the building is set up for offices but has no tenants and the space is not included in the approved CUP. They would like to use the space for brewery storage and don’t currently intend to have occupants. They indicated the offices and space are useless until they can move walls; the walls with electrical panels would stay and would obtain permits, if required, to move gas or electric lines. They asked if they need to work with an architect since they’re only removing stuff. They utilized a state website for demolition requirements and found a deconstruction form. Mark indicated this form details where to send it in and outlines how to dispose of the product being deconstructed. Mark indicated state and city building codes will require an architect whether they are changing one part of the building or the entire building, including removal of walls and ceilings. The use of the space is being changed for the current office space use. Mark asked what their future plans for this space look like. Mark indicated city staff reviews architectural plans and inspect buildings during construction to ensure compliance with codes and regulations outlined by the architect. He doesn’t know what would be required. Chris stated an architect may require things that building officials may not be aware of. Aegir asked if an engineer could sign off on the plans? Mark stated the architect will determine if there is a need for an engineer for their plans. Chris suggested someone else can prepare the plan documents, and if willing, an architect can sign off on those drawings. He recommended they talk to an architect about their future plans and layout to save costs in the long run. The architect will want to know their future occupancy plans. Aegir then asked questions about amending the CUP. Chris explained the CUP was for the north half of the building only and any changes including the south half (currently office space) would require an amendment to their current CUP. Aegir indicated they are working with an asphalt company to discuss parking lot/space expansion to support their plans. Chris suggested they make sure the parking lot is expanded in a manner that supports their future plans. He explained that the amendment to the CUP allows them two years to complete requirements. An extension can be granted if they show good faith. Their plans can be done in phases but suggested spelling them out in detail. Chris indicated parking will dictate their overall occupant load. Aegir asked if the CUP can be contingent on adding more parking? Chris indicated parts of the application could be, but specific uses could not occur until the parking is satisfied. The deck layout was reviewed and since the deck is in the same spot as originally proposed, no CUP amendment is required. Aegir discussed building permit timelines for deck approval as they want it done by May 5. Mark asked if they are attaching the deck to the building? Aegir stated no, it’s a standalone deck raised one foot above grade. They discussed the need for diamond piers and Mark indicated code doesn’t require diamond piers for a standalone deck. He asked about the frost level and if the area is wet? An architect and engineer will not force someone to do something that isn’t required in the code. A raised platform requires a permit. The state building code states you are exempt from requiring a permit for a raised platform or deck