7.8 SR 07-17-2023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

8. The council may establish varied and reasonable lot area, frontage, side yard, and setback requirements for a PUD and may authori'e a density which it determines to be appropriate under the circumstances. Any permitted density shall be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan and not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Approval of a PUD agreement, outlining the performance standards and approval process for the current project and future development within the concept plan, is included as a condition of approval. The review and approval of that agreement will take place during a following meeting. 9. More than one principal building may be constructed on a lot within a PUD if authorised by the council. Unless othernrise permitted by the council, a PUD shall coupjwitb the schedules of dimensional regulations set forth in this article, except that individual lots shall have no less than 80 percent of the minimum area for similar uses. The project does not conflict with standards described in city code. Preliminary Plat City ordinance section 30-375 outlines the required findings for approval of a Preliminary Plat. 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the -oning regulations (article VI of this chapter) and conforms in all respects with all requirements of this Code, including the honing regulations and this article. The proposed subdivision requires approval of a rezoning application. Provided the zoning is amended to PUD, and recommended conditions are included, the proposed subdivision is consistent with all zoning regulations. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable general and speciali.Zed cio, county, and regional plans, including, but not limited to, the city's comprehensive development plan. The subdivision is consistent with all applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics ofthe site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility toflooding, and drainage are suitable for the type and density of development and uses contemplated The physical characteristics of the site support the proposed use. The wetland impacts will be reviewed by the city and state through the established review process. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage transportation, erosion control and all other services, facilities and improvements otherwise required in this article. The subdivision includes public utilities and stormwater infrastructure that meets city requirements. Additional permits required to comply with erosion control standards are required and must be secured prior to building permit issuance. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. Again, wetland impacts are under review, and approval of those impacts is included as a condition of approval. 6. The proposed subdivision mill not confZict nrith easements of record or with easements established b_ y judgment of a court. There are no conflicts with easements of record. 7. The proposed subdivision nrill not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of neighboring land. Neighboring properties are largely developed, and the uses are consistent with the proposed uses. The subdivision will not impact reasonable development of neighboring land. 8. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage.