Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council / CU 05-22 <br />[)ecernber 19, 2005 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Grading. Drainage and Utilities <br /> <br />Grading, Drainage and Utilities are addressed in the City Engineer's memo. <br /> <br />Standards for Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit <br /> <br />The issuance of a Conditional Use Permit can be ordered only if the use at the proposed <br />location: <br /> <br />1. Will not endanger, ifljure or detrimentallY qffect the use and e'!iqyment 0/ other propertY in the <br />immediate viciniry or the public health, sqfery, morals, comfOrt, convenience or general we!fare 0/ the <br />neighborhood or the ciry. <br />2. Will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. Will not impede the normal and orderlY development and improvement 0/ surrounding vacant <br />propertY. <br />4. Will be served adequatelY f?y and will not adverselY qffect essential public facilities and services <br />including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and sewer .rystems, parks <br />and schools; and will not, in particular, create trqffic congestion or interference with trqffic on <br />acfjacent and neighboring public thoroughfares. <br />5. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions 0/ operation that will <br />be detrimental to a'!)! persons or propertY because 0/ excessive trqffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, <br />odors, dust or vibrations. <br />6. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage 0/ a natural, scenic or historic .feature 0/ mqjor <br />importance. <br />7. Will fullY complY with all other requirements rf this Code, including a'!)! applicable requirements <br />and standards fOr the issuance 0/ a license or permit to establish and operate the proposed use in the <br />ciry. <br /> <br />If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or <br />determinations by findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with <br />the standards set forth in Section 30-654. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Actions <br /> <br />One resident spoke with concern of increased noise and asked what the future building <br />setbacks would be. <br /> <br />The majority of the discussion was the test driving of motorcycles and where they would <br />access Hwy 10. Should access be limited to the controlled intersection of 171 st Avenue? <br />The consensus was that it would make sense to make that a condition but that it would not <br />be enforceable so they decided against that as a condition. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request. <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\2005\CU 05-22 Saxon\CU 05-22_CC.doc <br />