Laserfiche WebLink
Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes <br />May 10, 2023 <br />Page 2 <br />Commissioner Niziolek asked if staff has notified neighbors of this project. Mr. Hecker shared he was <br />not sure if neighbors have not been notified. Commissioner Anderson explained that this idea was <br />brought up about 3 years ago and it took time to find an Eagle Scout to do the project. <br />7.1 Meadowvale Heights Park Privacy Fence Request <br />Mr. Hecker presented the staff report. The boardwalks were deteriorating and were replaced with an <br />ADA compliant paved trail which required moving the trail 20 ft closer to Barrett's property. Staff <br />met with various homeowners that were adjacent to the park property a few years ago to discuss the <br />changes. <br />Mr. Sevcik shared that bare root shrubs were planted along the property line, but they take time to <br />grow. <br />Chair Williams invited Dirk and Jane Barret to speak. <br />Dirk and Jane Barrett, 13210 196`' Ave, shared they are not suggesting it needs to be a privacy fence <br />and think there is enough space between their property and the trail to plant larger trees to provide a <br />screen. They built their house in 2002 and designed it to take advantage of the privacy. There is a lack <br />of privacy and 50-75 people walk by each day on the path. They would be okay with natural <br />vegetation instead of a fence. <br />Commissioner Holmgren shared that he uses the trail, and it is very different now and it feels like <br />you're walking through people's yards. <br />Commissioner Anderson shared that he stopped by the Barrett's house last week and shared while it <br />is different, it will be less obvious when the buckthorn leaves come out. It is a very shady <br />environment in their backyard and there is not a lot of quality ground to plant trees. He is at a loss as <br />to how the city can help with tree planting on city property because he doesn't think that will work. If <br />the Barrett's asked for a fence it would be setting a precedent that we wouldn't recommend. <br />Commissioner Brown stated if we installed a fence it would need to be right next to the trail to <br />provide screening and it would be difficult and set a precedent. He asked if a berm could be added <br />instead of a fence. Commissioner Anderson shared it wouldn't provide enough privacy. <br />Mr. Stremcha suggested looking into the option of the Barrett's donating a fence to be installed on <br />city property if city staff would be willing to install it. This way it wouldn't set a precedent for city <br />funds being applied towards the fence. <br />Commissioner Holmgren would like something done and is curious about the donation possibility. <br />Commissioner Niziolek shared the only creative solution he has is to remove trees and put in Cedar <br />and Hemlock trees that provides a lot of greenery and would give a higher screen than an 8ft fence in <br />5-10 years. <br />Chair Williams shared his concern about the Barrett's asking for a privacy fence in their email, and he <br />said that is a precedent he is not willing to vote for but is okay with exploring other options. <br />1 I E I E I 1 <br />NATMi <br />