7.5 SR 06-20-2023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7. A PUD shall not adveTsely a�fect existin� o�� j�T�o�osed�a�ks, school�; st7eets oT� otheT��ul�lic faczlities. Existin� public facilities are not impacted b5T the proposed project and additional park facilities are included in the project. 8. The council may estal�lish va�zed and Teasonal�le lot a�ea, f�ontage, sideyaTd, and setl�ack reguiT•elnents foT� a PUD and lnay autho�z�e a density 2a�hich it dete��nines to be a��o��zate under the ci�zz�7nstances. Any�e�7nitted density shall 1�e consistent aa�ith the city's co�n��ehen.rive�lan and not adve�:sely a�fect the�ul�lic health, safety and 2a�elfa�e. The proposal is consistent with densities described in the comprehensive plan, setbacks from public rights-of-wayT, and design standards for similar developments within cityT code. 9. More than one��znci�al l�uildin� lnay l�e constT�cted on a lot aa�ithin a PUD if autbo�z�e�l l�y tbe council. Unless otheTra�ise�e�7nitted l�y the council, a PUD shall coln�ly 2a�ith the schedules of dilnensional Te�ulations set fo��h in this a�fiicle, except that individual lots shall have no less than 80 pe��cent of the �ninilnu�n aT ea fo�• silnilaT• uses. The project does not conflict with standards described in cinT code. Preliminar�- Plat CityT ordinance section 30-375 outlines the required findings for approval of a PreliminaryT Plat. 1. The proposed sul�division is consistent �aritb the �oning � egulations �a��icle VI of this chapte�� and confo��ns in all re��ects 2��ith all requizelnents of this Code, includin� the �onin� ye�ulations and this a��icle. The pYoposed subdivision requiYes approval of a Yezoning application to PUD along with a CUP that establishes the PUD. These changes will allow the development to deviate fYom strict interpretation of specific standards outlined in the ordinance. The deviations revie�ved for this pYoject generally relate to lot sizes and setbacks. Provided the zoning is amended to PUD, and recommended conditions are included, the proposed subdivision is consistent with all zoning regulations. 2. Tbe �� o�osed subdivision is consistent 2arith all a��lical�le �ener al and sj�eciali�ed city, county, and T e�ional�lans, including l�ut not lilnited to, tbe czty's co�nprehensive develop�nentplan. The subdivision is consistent with all applicable plans. 3. The�bysical chaTacte�zstics of the site, includin� l�ut not li�nited to to�o�ra�hy, soils, ve�etation, susce�til�ility to erosion and siltation, susce�tibility to fZoodiny,, and dTaina�e are suital�le for the ty�e and density of develo�lnent and uses conteln�lated. The physical characteristics of the site suppoYt the pYoposed use. The wetland impacts will be reviewed by the cityT and state through the established review process. Stormwater features, including a net�vork of pipes and basins, will ensure �vater leaving the site, and flo�ving on to adjacent propeYries, is generallyr consistent with present day metrics. 4. The�To�osed sul�division �nakes adequate�rovision foz• �ater su��ly, stoT�n d7aina�e, se2a�a�e tTan.s�o�fiation, erosion contzol and all otheT�seTvices, facilities and ilnp�ove�nents othe��a�ise zeguiTed in this aT�icle. The subdivision includes public utilities and stormwater infrastructure that meets cit�J requirements. Additional peYmits YequiYed to comply with erosion control standards are a requiYed and must be secured prior to buildin� permit issuance.