My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2a ERMUSR 04-11-2023
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2023
>
04-11-2023
>
5.2a ERMUSR 04-11-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 4:31:28 PM
Creation date
4/13/2023 1:41:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
4/11/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. About This Report <br />This report focuses on distribution system reliability across the country and is <br />customized to each utility that participates in the American Public Power Association's <br />eReliability Tracker service. APPA created the eReliability Tracker Annual Report to assist <br />utilities in their efforts to understand and analyze their electric system. In 2012, APPA <br />developed the eReliability Tracker thanks to a grant from the Demonstration of Energy <br />& Efficiency Developments (DEED) program. <br />This report reflects data in the eReliability Tracker from January 1, 2022 to December <br />31, 2022. This analysis might not properly reflect your utility's statistics if you do not <br />have a full year of data in the system. The report includes data recorded as of March <br />14, 2023. <br />Reliability reflects both historic and ongoing engineering investment decisions within a <br />utility. Proper use of reliability metrics ensures that a utility is performing its intended <br />function and is providing service in a consistent and effective manner. <br />While the primary use of reliability statistics is for self -evaluation, you can use these <br />statistics to compare your utility with similar utilities. However, differences such as <br />electrical network configuration, ambient environment, weather conditions, and <br />number of customers served typically limit most utility -to -utility comparisons. Due to <br />the diverse range of utilities that use the eReliability Tracker, this report endeavors to <br />improve comparative analyses by grouping utilities by size and region. <br />Since this report contains data for all utilities that use the eReliability Tracker, it is <br />important to consider how a particularly large or small utility can affect comparative <br />benchmarks. To ease the issues associated with comparability, each utility's reliability <br />statistics are weighted based on customer count when aggregated. This means that all <br />utilities are equally weighted, and all individual statistics are developed on a per <br />customer basis. <br />The aggregate statistics in this report are calculated from the 285 utilities with verified <br />2022 outage data. Utilities that experienced no outages in 2022, or did not upload any <br />data, will have NULL, None, or "0" values in their report for utility -specific data and <br />were not included in the aggregate analysis. Also note that log -normal data with a z- <br />score"' greater than 3.25 may be excluded if it significantly distorts the aggregate <br />statistics. <br />1. A z-score indicates how much a data point differs from the mean. For instance, a z-score of 3.25 indicates <br />that the data point is three and one -quarter standard deviations from the mean. A z-score of 0 indicates <br />that the data point is identical to the mean. , <br />2 <br />Im <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.