Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 3 <br />December 13, 2004 <br />----------------------------- <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuester noted some of the concerns with the residents being odor and gas, <br />lack of screening, and existing contamination. Mr. Rohlf stated that he feels that it is not <br />practical to keep the landfill below the tree line. He stated that another concern was truck <br />traffic. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing stated that this might be the opportunity to say “no, we don’t want to <br />expand the landfill”. She asked when do we say no to future requests if this one is approved. <br />Steve Rohlf stated that 221 Avenue us the logical southern boundary for the landfill. The <br />st <br />Mayor stated that she would like to have staff look at the host fee and “making it worth our <br />while.” The Mayor further stated that the city should look at this issue as to how it relates <br />to the city’s image. <br /> <br />B. Hamilton Property <br /> <br />The history of this property is that it was formerly used as an automobile salvage yard called <br />Custom Motors. A phase II environmental assessment of the property was conducted in <br />1993 and residual contamination from the junkyard was found and has yet to be cleaned up. <br />The type of contamination found did not pose an immediate threat since the contaminants <br />don’t migrate rapidly. But it has been long enough ago that staff is concerned that clean up <br />should take place soon. <br /> <br />The property was purchased by Russell Hamilton and he was made aware and received a <br />copy of the environmental assessment. <br /> <br />Staff did an inspection on July 9, 2002 and ordered the buildings on the property razed or <br />repaired and the contamination to be removed. A meeting with Mr. Hamilton, his attorney <br />and city staff on November 5, 2003 established a timetable for removing the buildings on <br />the site and the clean up of the contamination. This was supposed to have been <br />accomplished by October 31, 2004. After having difficulty getting a work plan approved by <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, it is now late in the year for the potential clean up. <br />Mr. Hamilton’s environmental consultant contends a new realistic deadline for the clean up <br />of August 31, 2005. Mr. Hamilton would like the city to sponsor a contamination <br />remediation grant. This grant would pay up to 75% of the cost of investigating the extent of <br />the contamination clean up. However, the city would be responsible for the other 25% of <br />these costs. <br /> <br />This site was also the location of illegal burning of refuse by the R.C. Rolloff Company in <br />2002. Contamination from that incident was remediated at a cost of approximately $75,000 <br />in the summer of 2002 by MPCA. The City of Elk River reimbursed MPCA. Mr. Rohlf <br />wished to have direction from the Council whether the city should agree to the August 31, <br />2005 deadline or immediately start legal action. Councilmember Tveite stated that if we are <br />offering an extension, we need to have a work plan in place as to when this could be cleaned <br />up. Mr. Hamilton has to follow the work plan and progress needs to be shown. It also <br />needs to be stated that in the event that there is a default of the work plan in this time <br />frame, Mr. Hamilton will have to pay legal fees if the city would need to go to court on <br />August 31, 2005. <br /> <br />Mr. Rohlf also wished to know if the city wanted to participate in a 25% cost-sharing grant <br />for cleaning up this site and if a workforce housing was an appropriate use in this location. <br /> <br />