Laserfiche WebLink
At their Januaryr 24, 2023, work session, the Commission had an in-depth discussion Yegarding the changes and, <br />along with some additional changes, recommended moving forward `vith a review byT Council. <br />Land Use Amendments <br />While preparing for this land use and zoning amendment process, staff identified several areas of the approved <br />Land Use Map that require updates as theyT `vere incorrectl�T assigned on the 2021 land use plan. These errors, <br />along with otheY pYoposed changes, aYe described on the attached exhibit ritled "Land Use Map (PYoposed)". <br />Changes to note are as follows: <br />■ The Neighborhood Commercial node at Count�r Road 13 and Viking Blvd. increased in size. <br />■ Bowling alley site (north of Orono Park) is proposed to change from Traditional Single FamilyT Residential <br />to Mixed Residential. <br />■ Guardian ringels on Main Street is proposed to change from MultifamilyT to Neighborhood Commercial. <br />■ The area west of the train station is proposed to change from Neighborhood Commercial to Business <br />Park. <br />■ The land south of Hwyr 10/169 and east of Kelleyr Farm is proposed to change from Traditional Single <br />Famil�T Residential to HighwayT Business. <br />■ The southeast portion of the cityT proposed to change from Traditional Single FamilyT Residential to Rural <br />Residential. <br />■ An area east of Cargill changed from Rural Residential to Agricultural. <br />■ All ERX land previouslyT approved under a CUP is proposed to be High`vayT Business. <br />■ Removed the Utilities & Railroad land use and identified those as Public/Semi-Public <br />Additionally, considering the urban service expansion study that the cityT and ERMU completed and recently <br />accepted, the Commission discussed the areas proposed for utilityT expansion. Based on the financial limitations <br />and to avoid leapfrog development, the Commission recommended removing the NW utilityT expansion areas <br />west of the great northern trail. This would include the area that was recently reviewed by Council for a new <br />residential subdivision. <br />Ordinance Amendments and Zone Changes <br />The Comprehensive Plan also points towards the creation of a new or significantlyT changed residential zoning <br />districts. It is Yecommended to combine the R-1b, R-1c, and R-1d districts into one zoning district The difference <br />between these three districts are minor lot size and setback changes. The proposed amendment, creating the R2 <br />Traditional Single-Family Residential district, combines these three districts and utilizes their smallest lot size and <br />setbacks thus minimizing legal non-conforming parcels to those that may e�st todayT. <br />The to`vnhouse district (R3) is proposed to no longer be recognized as an independent zoning district To`vnhouse <br />uses will be absorbed into the newlyT proposed RZ and R3 districts. The current R3 performance standards will <br />continue to be referenced for future townhouse developments. Existing properties developed prior to the <br />adoption of this proposed amendment would be allo`ved to continue with their previouslyT established <br />peYfoYmance standards. <br />Staff has drafted oY modified language foY fouY Yesidential zoning districts as outlined: <br />1. R1 Rural Residential <br />Drafted to reflect our current R-1a district which has a 2'/2 acre minimum lot size without cit�T services. <br />2. R2 Traditional Single-Family Residential <br />Drafted to reflect and combine our current R1b-d, R2a-b, & R3 districts urban service parcels. Per the <br />Comprehensive Plan, this district also encourages a gentle increase in densityT byT allo`ving redevelopment in <br />