Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />September 26, 2005 <br /> <br />File: 226-082P <br /> <br />Mr. Scott Harlicker <br />Senior Planner <br />City of Elk River <br />13065 Orono Parkway <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br /> <br />RE: HERITAGE MAPLES ADDITION <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Harlicker: <br /> <br />As requested, we have reviewed the revised submittal package for the Heritage Maples <br />Addition as prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. The revised set of plans had a revision date <br />of September 20, 2005. Our comments will keep in mind our previous comments in a letter <br />to you dated August 15, 2005. <br /> <br />A Existing Conditions Plan <br /> <br />Neither of our questions relative to the Existing Conditions Plan were answered in the <br />revised submittal. The original questions asked were as follows: <br /> <br />. The Existing Conditions Plan shows a 50-foot roadway easement adjacent to 1H 10 <br />that runs from the northwest comer to the southeast comer and through the comer <br />of the Beck property. Is this an easement of record and does the 50-foot easement <br />exist through the Beck property? <br /> <br />. There is also an area labeled 'existing easement" adjacent to 1H 10 and <br />approximately centrally located in the property that appears to be 66 feet wide by 220 <br />feet long. Who is this easement in favor of and what is it for? <br /> <br />B. Service Road <br /> <br />. The preliminary plat has been revised to show a 60-foot right of way for the service <br />road adjacent to 1H 10. I have had a conversation with Terry Humbert, the <br />MnDOT Project Manager for the 1H 10 Interregional Corridor and he concurs that <br />60-foot right of way should be sufficient for the future when improvements are <br />Phone: 763.635.1000 <br />Fax: 763.635.1090 <br /> <br />www.d.elk-river.mn.us <br />