Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />This feasibility report for street reconstruction improvements on Dodge Avenue was authorized <br />through Council Resolution 05-71 adopted by the Elk River City Council at their June 20, 2005 <br />meeting. The location of the proposed street for reconstruction in 2005 is presented on Exhibit 1 <br />and as follows: <br /> <br />Street <br />Dodge Avenue <br /> <br />From <br />5th Street <br /> <br />To <br />935 feet north of 5th Street <br /> <br />Length <br />935 ft. <br /> <br />II. PROJECT SCOPE <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of street reconstruction improvements on <br />Dodge A venue. This study will discuss the existing conditions of the street and the storm <br />drainage system along with the sanitary sewer and water facilities. Also addressed within this <br />report are the proposed improvements, estimated project costs, proposed project funding sources, <br />and an anticipated project schedule. This project will be accomplished under Minnesota Statute <br />429, and will thus require a public hearing and assessment hearing. Project costs consist of <br />estimated construction costs plus overhead, which includes City administration, engineering, <br />fiscal, and legal expenses. The City's past assessment policies will be used as a guide to discuss <br />financing methods for this project. <br /> <br />III. NECESSITY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS <br /> <br />Dodge Avenue was constructed in the early 1980's and sees significant traffic, both heavy <br />commercial and passenger vehicles. It is in poor condition and requires an inordinate amount of <br />maintenance to maintain a passable roadway. The project is necessary in order to provide the <br />residents of the City with safe and adequate public transportation facilities. <br /> <br />The project will minimize future maintenance costs and will likely be bid with other projects in <br />the City so the scope is large enough to ensure competitive construction bid prices. From this <br />standpoint the project is cost-effective. <br /> <br />1 <br />