My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-2007 DTMIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Downtown Task Force
>
DT Taskforce Minutes
>
2007
>
07-16-2007 DTMIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 1:23:17 PM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:12:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
DTMIN
date
7/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Redevelopment Framework Task Force Minutes Page 2 <br />July 16, 2007 <br />------------------------------------------ <br /> <br />the public participation meetings. He clarified that the Council concurred that the <br />stakeholder’s meeting should proceed acknowledging that the Highway 10 configuration as <br />shown will change based on discussions in August. <br /> <br />4. Review & Consider Acceptance of Draft Plan <br />Executive Summary <br />Community Development Director Scott Clark provided a PowerPoint presentation and <br />discussed with the Task Force the draft plan’s executive summary. Task Force member <br />Molly Nadeau stated a concern that paragraph #3 entitled “History” does not emphasize <br />saving Elk River’s “history” but mentions the importance of creating a “new history”. <br /> <br />Much discussion ensued regarding whether or not the “West Bluff Block” (the two blocks <br />extending from west of the Bluffs building) in the core downtown should be preserved. The <br />majority of the Task Force agreed that although they would not oppose redeveloping these <br />buildings, the buildings should be relabeled on the draft land use plan to state “no proposed <br />changes”. <br /> <br />In addition, the Task Force discussed the definition of “market driven” with the majority of <br />the Task Force agreeing that “market driven” is defined by a developer submitting an <br />unsolicited development or redevelopment proposal to a community, which may or may not <br />include a request for public financing. <br /> <br />Implementation Priorities <br />Director of Economic Development Catherine Mehelich continued the PowerPoint <br />presentation and discussed with the Task Force the short-term, mid-term and long-term <br />implementation priorities of the draft plan. <br /> <br />The Task Force particularly discussed one of the short-term implementation priorities, <br />which states ‘work with State Historic Preservation Office to determine structural and <br />financial feasibility to preserve the “Brick Block”.’ Staff and Ms. Kvilvang stated that the <br />reason the “Brick Block” was specifically mentioned in this section is because the Task <br />Force had discussed the issue at length at their last meeting and voted in favor of specifically <br />stating in the draft plan that the “Brick Block” be preserved. Task Force member Dave <br />Rymanowki added that tonight’s discussion is “going against what we have already said”. <br /> <br />Ms. Nadeau suggested that a study be completed to test the structural feasibility of <br />preserving the “West Bluff Block” buildings in addition to the “Brick Block”. Mr. <br />Rymanowski commented that the financial feasibility of preserving buildings is also <br />important. Ms. Kvilvang asked each Task Force member to explain his/her thoughts on this <br />issue. The majority of the Task Force agreed to Ms. Nadeau’s suggestion with the caveat <br />that the results of the study not preclude any property owners from redeveloping their <br />property. <br /> <br />Larry Toth suggested the access points for St. Andrew’s Church be reconsidered as it affects <br />the school. <br /> <br />Stacie Kvilvang clarified that the Task Force keep in mind this is a concept plan and not a <br />construction plan. After much discussion the majority of the Task Force concluded that the <br />plan be modified to include narrative allowing for the evaluation of historic and financial <br />feasibility of the “West Bluff Block” (the two blocks extending from west of the Bluffs <br />building). It was clarified that the feasibility study would only determine if restoration was
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.