My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-05-2007 DTMIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Downtown Task Force
>
DT Taskforce Minutes
>
2007
>
03-05-2007 DTMIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 1:11:38 PM
Creation date
1/19/2023 1:10:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
DTMIN
date
3/5/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Downtown Redevelopment Plan Task Force Minutes Page 3 <br />March 5, 2007 <br />------------------------------------------ <br /> <br /> The Tinklenberg Group will submit a 3rd request for $500,000 of Federal funding to further <br />analyze Hwy 10 through the downtown area. <br /> Terry Humbert, MnDOT Project Manager for Hwy 10 has indicated that there is no funding <br />in MnDOT’s 30 yr. plan for Hwy 10 downtown. <br /> Scott Bradley, MnDOT Chief Landscape Architect stated that it would be Terry Humbert’s <br />decision whether or not to bring the Context Sensitive Design group at MnDOT into Elk <br />River to enhance Hwy 10 improvements. (Mr. Maurer suggested that this may be an option <br />if the $500,000 of Federal funding was awarded to further study Hwy 10 downtown.) <br /> <br />Member Holme asked if traffic issues along Hwy 10 downtown are going to get worse within the <br />next fifteen years if nothing is done. Mr. Maurer stated “yes” according to MnDOT’s projections. <br />He expanded with the following: <br /> <br /> There is no funding available for thirty years; however MnDOT’s 30-year plan may change. <br /> MnDOT will likely fund improvements in the Anoka/Ramsey area prior to funding <br />improvements to Hwy 10 downtown. <br /> MnDOT District 3 will fund Hwy 169 projects prior than Hwy 10 projects. <br /> <br />Member Dana Anderson asked Mr. Maurer if safety issues would motivate MnDOT to make <br />improvements to the highway even though the Level of Service would still be rated an “F.” Mr. <br />Maurer stated that most reported deaths occur on 2-lane undivided highways and Highways 10 and <br />169 are considered relatively safe highways. <br /> <br />Conceptual Options <br />For the purposes of Task Force policy discussions, Mr. Maurer provided an overview of the <br />following four conceptual options: <br /> Lower highway <br /> Elevate highway <br /> Eliminate one intersection <br /> Do nothing <br /> <br />Mr. Maurer expanded on the “eliminate one intersection” option explaining that this option may be <br />the fastest way to improve traffic since eliminating an intersection is more cost effective than <br />lowering or elevating a highway. <br /> <br />Planner Chris Leeseberg presented animated images of how Hwy 10 would appear to travelers both <br />from a lowered and elevated perspective. He also presented a still image of how local traffic may be <br />realigned if one intersection in the downtown area were to be eliminated. He used the example of <br />eliminating the Main Street/Hwy 10 intersection. He reiterated that the images were concepts, not <br />designs. <br /> <br />Member Lindberg asked how long the construction of an elevated Hwy would last. Mr. Maurer <br />stated that he couldn’t say for sure since the area is so confined but that it would more than likely last <br />for an entire construction season. <br /> <br />Member Holme asked if there is enough Right of Way to elevate or lower the highway. Mr. Maurer <br />stated “yes” especially if MnDOT eliminates several access points to allow <br />for six lanes of traffic. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.