My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1 PRSR 11-09-2022
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2021-2030
>
2022
>
11-09-2022
>
7.1 PRSR 11-09-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2022 12:11:29 PM
Creation date
11/4/2022 12:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
11/9/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
22 ATHLETIC FIELDS STUDY <br />City of Elk River, Minnesota DRAFT <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br />PRIORITIZATION <br />When developing prioritization, actions can be evaluated by how <br />they improve the City’s system of athletic fi elds: <br />Does the action have positive safety implications? <br />The highest priority for the City should be actions that improve <br />safety outcomes. This includes things like netting, fi eld <br />maintenance, and provision of AEDs at fi elds. <br />Does the action improve capacity and address current or projected needs? <br />Actions such as the addition of lights and building new fi elds add <br />capacity to the system. The more recent addition of lights at YAC <br />have improved the capacity at those fi elds. An expansion at YAC <br />would have similar impacts. <br />Does the action strengthen the City’s operations and capacity for <br />funding? <br />Actions that create improvements for maintenance and operations <br />should be prioritized. The City has opted to consolidate fi elds in designated athletic facilities, rather than <br />dispersed around the community. The focus remains on providing fi elds in larger, consolidated locations <br />where maintenance can be streamlined and more effi cient. Other actions may strengthen the City’s <br />abilities to recruit and host tournaments (and increase fi eld rentals) or better position the City to pursue <br />other funding such as grants. <br />Does the action improve equitable distribution of resources between sports? <br />The City has done a great job of improving facilities for many of the youth athletic associations. If there are <br />sports that have not seen upgrades in some time, the priority should go to these sports over those that <br />have seen recent improvements and investments. <br />Does the action improve user experiences? <br />Elk River’s facilities provide varied user experiences. Upgrades at the YAC ballfi elds have been well <br />received, while a lack of toilets on the rectangle fi eld side or at DAAC remain a point of contention. <br />Elements such as appropriately sized fi elds, batting cages, shaded viewing areas, concessions, storage, <br />and parking go a long way to improving user experience. <br />TIMING <br />The study provides recommendations for the City of Elk River based on the identifi ed needs and desires <br />of the City and athletic associations. Some of these recommendations are easier to implement, others will <br />take some time to identify funding, design, and bring to fruition. Lastly, some of the recommendations <br />focus on strategy and programming and represent ongoing eff orts that are already underway.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.