Laserfiche WebLink
Applicable Regulation <br />(The applicant’s responses are italicized with staff’s notes after.) <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that the variance satisfies all five of the criteria described <br />below. The variance is: <br />1. Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, and <br />The variance is to allow access to detached garage, which is a use intended by the ordinance. <br /> <br />The general purpose and intend is to provide a buffer between a driveway and neighboring property for <br />drainage and utility purposes. The city engineering department has no concerns with a driveway being in a <br />portion of the 5-foot easement. If the variance is approved, staff recommends the driveway not be closer <br />than 1-foot from the property line. <br /> <br />2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br />Again, the City's comprehensive plan contemplated homes with accessory structures and being able to access them. <br /> <br />The property is guided for Traditional Single-Family Residential and single-family houses with accessory <br />structures and driveways are expected. The use is consistent with Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the <br />zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties means that: <br />3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br />ordinance; <br />The petitioner's use of the property is reasonable and permitted, with the exception of meeting the setback for a driveway. <br /> <br />Parcels larger than one acre in the R-1a zoning district are allowed two driveways. The petitioner proposes <br />to use the property in a reasonable manner. <br /> <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a consequence of the <br />petitioner's own action or inaction; and <br />Prior to the platting of this property the existing accessory structure (shown in red on the attached site plan) was access from the <br />bottom of a steep ridge. This access (shown in yellow) now crosses multiple lots and wetlands created when the property was <br />developed and can no longer be used. <br /> <br />As you can note, the contours on the west side of this lot are too steep for a new driveway. The only logical location down the <br />hill for a driveway is on the east side of the parcel. The location of the septic system (shown in orange) prohibits a driveway on <br />the east side from moving far enough west to meet the 5-foot setback from a property line to a driveway the entire distance. We <br />are only proposing a 10-foot-wide driveway, which isn't excessive. <br /> <br />The purpose of this 5-foot setback is so snow is not pushed onto a1n adjoining property. These are larger lots and shouldn't be <br />an issue, but we will plow in a manner that avoids placing snow on the neighboring property. <br /> <br />The original homestead had an established vehicular circulation pattern that worked with the landscape of <br />the property. With the platting of the property, the usability of the accessory structures is now dependent <br />on access responding to the new landscape constraints of the parcel. The plight of the petitioner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property and are not a consequence of the petitioner's own action or inaction. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />