My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. BASR 08-23-2022
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
08-23-2022
>
5.4. BASR 08-23-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2022 8:51:35 AM
Creation date
8/18/2022 8:50:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
8/23/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Applicable Regulation <br />(The applicant’s responses are italicized with staff’s notes after.) <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that the variance satisfies all five of the criteria described <br />below. The variance is: <br />1. Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, and <br />The variance is to allow access to detached garage, which is a use intended by the ordinance. <br /> <br />The general purpose and intend is to provide a buffer between a driveway and neighboring property for <br />drainage and utility purposes. The city engineering department has no concerns with a driveway being in a <br />portion of the 5-foot easement. If the variance is approved, staff recommends the driveway not be closer <br />than 1-foot from the property line. <br /> <br />2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br />Again, the City's comprehensive plan contemplated homes with accessory structures and being able to access them. <br /> <br />The property is guided for Traditional Single-Family Residential and single-family houses with accessory <br />structures and driveways are expected. The use is consistent with Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the <br />zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties means that: <br />3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br />ordinance; <br />The petitioner's use of the property is reasonable and permitted, with the exception of meeting the setback for a driveway. <br /> <br />Parcels larger than one acre in the R-1a zoning district are allowed two driveways. The petitioner proposes <br />to use the property in a reasonable manner. <br /> <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a consequence of the <br />petitioner's own action or inaction; and <br />Prior to the platting of this property the existing accessory structure (shown in red on the attached site plan) was access from the <br />bottom of a steep ridge. This access (shown in yellow) now crosses multiple lots and wetlands created when the property was <br />developed and can no longer be used. <br /> <br />As you can note, the contours on the west side of this lot are too steep for a new driveway. The only logical location down the <br />hill for a driveway is on the east side of the parcel. The location of the septic system (shown in orange) prohibits a driveway on <br />the east side from moving far enough west to meet the 5-foot setback from a property line to a driveway the entire distance. We <br />are only proposing a 10-foot-wide driveway, which isn't excessive. <br /> <br />The purpose of this 5-foot setback is so snow is not pushed onto a1n adjoining property. These are larger lots and shouldn't be <br />an issue, but we will plow in a manner that avoids placing snow on the neighboring property. <br /> <br />The original homestead had an established vehicular circulation pattern that worked with the landscape of <br />the property. With the platting of the property, the usability of the accessory structures is now dependent <br />on access responding to the new landscape constraints of the parcel. The plight of the petitioner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property and are not a consequence of the petitioner's own action or inaction. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.