Laserfiche WebLink
<br />During the site plan review, it was determined that a side yard setback variance is not required per Section 30-795 <br />(4). It states side yard requirements specified for a zoning district may be reduced to 20 percent of the lot width, <br />ten percent to be located on each side of a structure, in situations where the lot size is less than the minimum lot <br />size. The lot size is 0.87-acres and is zoned for 2 ½ acres. The lot width is 145’ where 20% of that is 29’. This <br />results in 14.5’ setback requirement for the side yards. The homeowners are proposing the deck addition to be <br />17-18’ from the side property line. <br /> <br />This application has been postponed several times for the applicant to obtain a new Letter of Map Amendment <br />(LOMA), to determine what improvements, if any, are allowed within the Mississippi Floodway. The LOMA was <br />revised, and the structures have been removed from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and the <br />Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). <br /> <br />Applicable Regulation <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that the variance satisfies all five of the criteria described <br />below. The variance: <br />1. Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, and <br />The general purpose and intent of setbacks is to provide uniformity with the placement of homes in a <br />zoning district. The setback requirements from rivers require impervious hardcovered structures further <br />away to allow more vegetated area to slow stormwater runoff and have it naturally absorb into the ground <br />as well as filter out any sediments. Most of the homes in the area are set back the same amount from the <br />river. <br /> <br />2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Comprehensive Plan guides the property as ‘Traditional Single Family Residential’ where single family <br />homes, decks, and pools are desired uses. <br /> <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the <br />zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties means that: <br />3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; <br /> <br />Requesting to have a deck/pool in the back yard is a reasonable use of the property. <br /> <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not a consequence of the petition's own action or <br />inaction; and <br />The applicant stated the property received a variance for the placement of the home within the 100’ <br />setback requirement from the Ordinary High Water (OHW) mark of the river. The survey shows the <br />house about 60-70’ from the OHW. This is a unique circumstance that limits the ability to have a deck, <br />like other homes in the city. The deck/pool would meet typical rear yard setback requirement if the river <br />was not there. <br /> <br />5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />All the homes in this area on the river fall within the 100’ river setback and several homes have decks on <br />the river side of the house. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> <br />Financial Impact <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />