Laserfiche WebLink
ALTERNATIVE #1 <br />SIGNALS <br />Low Cost: $75M <br />High Cost: $114M <br />ALTERNATIVE #2 <br />RCIs <br />Low Cost: $78M <br />High Cost: $117M <br />171SFAVENUE R 171SF <br />TWIN LAKES ROAD - TWIN <br />165TH AVENUE R <br />KELLV FARM ROAD R <br />ADAMS THE <br />ALPINE DRIVE R <br />CSRF <br />Figure 25. Preliminary Alternatives <br />© At -Grade Access Closed,$300,000 each RCI <br />O Right -In, Right -Out Intersection O. <br />(includes 1,500 ft. acceleration lanes on TH 10) <br />OSignalized Intersection O <br />ALTERNATIVE #3 <br />GRADE -SEPARATED <br />Low Cost: $94M <br />High Cost: $180M <br />Reduced -Conflict Intersection <br />Signalized Reduced -Conflict Intersection <br />Grade -Separated <br />aRemove Signal <br />TOTAL COST <br />Total Cost Estimates Include the following: <br />- Local Roadway Costs which assumed the <br />following: <br />- 9.37 miles of local roadway construction. <br />-Three-lone urban roadway typicalsection. <br />- ROW and Design and Engineering costs <br />were included. <br />-Grade-separated alternatives included 0.23 miles <br />of reconstruction of Highway 10 to meet design <br />requirements for a freeway facility. <br />-Grade-separated alternative costs were based on <br />an averagefor the alternatives of interchanges, <br />High-T and Button Hooks. <br />- ROW and Design and Engineering costs were <br />included for the grade -separated alternative. <br />-Alternatives #1 and #2 included the cost to <br />expand Highway 10 to a six -lane section in the high <br />cost total. <br />