Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Heritage Maples <br />October 17, 2005 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit <br /> <br />The Commission voted 5:0 to recommend denial of the proposed rezoning from C3 to PUD <br />and the conditional use permit for the PUD based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the current land use designation of Cc. <br />2. The proposed project is too dense for this site. <br />3. The proposed project includes grading and development up to the edge of the <br />wetland. <br />4. Appropriate setbacks are not maintained. The buildings are too close to property <br />lines, streets and street right-of-ways. <br /> <br />Preliminary Plat <br /> <br />The Commission voted 5:0 to recommend denial of the proposed preliminary plat based on <br />the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed plat is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan or <br />the current zoning. <br />2. The proposed plat does not include appropriate setbacks. <br />3. The proposed plat is too dense for the site. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommended that Council deny the applicant's requests for the <br />a Land Use Plan amendment from CC to UR, rezoning from C3 to PUD, conditional use <br />permit for the PUD and preliminary plat for Heritage Maples based on the findings listed <br />above. <br /> <br />The applicant has worked to address some of the issues raised at the September 27th <br />Planning Commission meeting. They have submitted revised development plans since the <br />Planning Commission made their recommendation on September 27th. The Commission has <br />not reviewed the plans that the Council is considering. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the Council approve the applicant's request for a Land Use Plan <br />amendment from CC to UR based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed amendment is appropriate for this site because the proposed land use <br />is compatible with the adjacent residential land uses. <br />2. The proposed amendment is appropriate for this site because it is accessed from <br />local streets that service residential neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the Council approve the applicant's request rezoning from C3 to <br />PUD based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed PUD zoning is consistent with the proposed land use of Urban <br />Residential. <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\2005\P 05-16 Heritage Maples\P05-016CC10-17.doc <br />